→
UPDATE
- OS,ソフトウエアの理解。
私は、2005年頃から自主的にインストールした恐らく、P2Pを介したサーバーを構築している他国、国内の個人のサーバーへの接続。グランドセフトオート3のオンラインセッション（現在、一般的になっている。大きな市場になっている。所謂クラウドと呼ばれる物の種別。）やコンテンツそのものの合法的な範囲での改ざんを重ね、システムの
脆弱性を理解する過程を歩んできました。私が行うのは主に簡単な改ざんや非常に軽微な部類のハッキング。資金に関して大きなダメージを与えない。クラッキングと呼ばれていた、簡易なソフトウエア―の使用には含まれていたようですが、これは、現在の大規模なハッキングの基礎概念です。こういったソフトウエアは比較一般的に出回っており、イギリスでは、子供などでも使っている事がある。開発者、その企業が敢えて見逃している。敢えて
行わせると言う範囲になっている。
私は、全てを専門的に行っているわけではなく、ごく一般的な民間人から見れば、比較的高度な趣味。と言う物の範囲に留まるでしょう。これらは、OS,ソフトウエアー内部で改ざんを行う為に使うソフトウエア―と共にコンテンツを起動するのに、5時間位を費やすようなケースがある。
私は、iPhoneが完全にクラッキングされている世界で類を見ない映像をアメリカの主要な新聞-Mediaのほとんどに投稿し、政府側のサーバーの構築が必須である。と、業務の改善を促したがGafam。（当時、私がMAGA FAGA NHEと呼んでいた）は、個別の政治家とのコンタクトをせず、依然、法的な枠組みにおいてXの買収程度が進んだ程度で、何も改善の目途が立っていないようである。
その為、世界でも類を見ない。iPhoneのクラッキング映像をアメリカの新聞社に投稿した経緯から、ヘッジファンドに関わる諜報機関と言えるか？不明ですが、名称は諜報機関的なグループは継続し、私のオンライン上の活動を見る義務は生じている可能性があると思いますが、
政府として、全ての不正なIPが国内に入る前に弾くなどの政府インフラと呼べる物に関して、
2022年にはSNS、またはホワイトハウスに直接、要請していたものの、全く着手が進んでいなかったようだ。そこから、このような手段で、ヘッジファンドなどに教える必要があったようだ。
彼等はどちらかと言えば、完全な混乱と逃避の中にいる可能性がある。
指示型のAIの存在により、周囲に極左のようなグループが行き来し知らずに私の地域は、そういった主体が多く、地域で非常にトラブルに陥って困っている。
※世界的に政治家が、電信柱に電話線が繋がっているだけの物に過ぎない状態がインターネットである。と言う理解が無い事に危機感がある。
ーーー
こちらが、私は趣味で作っていた映像の一部です。
iPhoneが激しくハッキングされた映像は、当時で言えばZerodayと言われていた物で、
iPhoneには、80年代のコードすら使われていたとされる。グーグルのIanBeerのグループが発表している、趣味の動画のように見えるチームによって解消されたとされています。
IanBeerのアカウントを見れば、同じようなクラッキングの再現がされています。
ーーー
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikZTNSmbh00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sTw7GGoJ6g
グーグル、アップルのセキュリティー最高峰の精鋭チーム。Zerodayへの対策を行った、Project Zero （4~5名。）
のチームです。
The issue was reportedly addressed by Project Zero, an elite security research team at Google, associated with Ian Beer. Project Zero is regarded as one of the world’s foremost teams for identifying and responding to zero-day vulnerabilities, including vulnerabilities affecting major platforms such as Apple’s iOS.
The team appears to have consisted of only a small number of highly specialised researchers, approximately four to five members, yet it operated at the highest level of global software-security research. A review of Ian Beer’s public material shows similar demonstrations and reproductions of cracking techniques and vulnerability behaviour.
ーーー
These matters, however, relate primarily to information specialised in zero-day vulnerabilities. Beyond that area, there appears to have been little or no meaningful progress on the larger structural concepts I have proposed, including the construction of government-side server infrastructure capable of blocking unlawful IP traffic before it enters the domestic digital environment, and the improvement of how GAFA/M（FAGA）-related domains and digital content are distributed across networks.
My position is that certain unlawful IP addresses, regional traffic patterns, and communications associated with specific individuals or organised actors should be separated within government-controlled servers, duplicated, scanned, and examined where necessary. Ordinary civilians should be excluded from such measures. However, in relation to certain abnormal or organised entities, sustained monitoring may be essential.
I should also note that the concept of online expansion content for Rockstar Games originated from an idea I directly communicated to Rockstar Games by email. In that case, I was disregarded, while the model itself became monetisable. Rockstar Games and Take-Two Interactive are said to have generated approximately ten billion dollars in profit from these developments.
Even so, despite that commercial success, they appear still to be producing additional video-style content, including material placed within 3D residential spaces at the starting point of the game environment, while speaking from a position of authority.
ーーー
Playback may not be supported depending on the specific operating environment; this issue does not stem from user error.
h ttps://www.tiktok.com/@a_v_i_a_t_i_o_n/video/7268848485108141354
Regarding the matter where F-22 stealth fighters have been observable via the online platform 'airnab rader' for over ten years, it is assessed that capturing the live site interface remains far less logistically complex than producing fraudulent video material. Local observation verifies that actual aircraft trajectories conform strictly to the tracking data provided by this platform, with military assets apparently following identical parameters. Consequently, there is a distinct possibility that they are employing flight management operations structured similarly to Google Maps.
ーーー
While the technical transition should have logically been limited to reverting to standard three-point trilateration GPS, it is highly plausible that senior, aging bureaucrats succumbed to institutional pressure in the presence of their younger, female counterparts. Overwhelmed by the superior digital literacy of the younger generation, these senior officials submissively and seamlessly signed off on global agreements while remaining technically uninformed. Yet, a critical ambiguity persists: precisely how did this worldwide alignment occur, and through what mechanisms was the comprehensive overhaul of flight operations executed? This transition remains profoundly enigmatic.
It is highly probable that senior bureaucrats operating under a cognitive error perceive the younger generation's digital pursuits as trivial or effortless. In reality, even digital content production within specialized developer-centric groups represents a culmination of intensive rigor. Witnessing young female none-officials adeptly navigating advanced platforms like Logic, these senior counterparts likely recognized their own absolute technical obsolescence. Consequently, it is heavily implied that they submissively and seamlessly slipped their signatures onto these agreements as a desperate psychological mechanism to obscure their own systemic incompetence
ーーー
ーーー
English version.
Understanding of Operating Systems and Software
Since around 2005, I have developed a practical understanding of operating systems and software through independent experimentation. This included connecting, through systems that may have been based on P2P structures, to personal servers located both domestically and overseas, as well as participating in online sessions related to Grand Theft Auto III. Such online-session models have since become common and have grown into a major market, forming one category of what is now broadly referred to as cloud-based infrastructure.
I also repeatedly engaged in lawful modification of digital content itself, within the permissible scope of the content, and through that process came to understand certain system vulnerabilities.
The activities I conducted were mainly simple modifications and very minor forms of hacking. They were not intended to cause major financial damage. They appeared to fall within the use of simplified software tools once commonly referred to as “cracking” tools, and these tools represent one of the basic conceptual foundations of large-scale hacking as it exists today.
Such software was relatively widely available, and in the United Kingdom, similar tools have reportedly been used even by children. In that sense, developers and companies may, in some cases, have knowingly tolerated such activity, or allowed it to occur within an implied range of use.
I do not claim to have carried out all of this as a formal specialist. From the perspective of an ordinary civilian, my experience would likely be understood as a comparatively advanced technical hobby. In some cases, launching content together with software used to modify internal operating-system or software behavior could require approximately five hours of preparation.
I submitted highly unusual video material showing what I understood to be a severely compromised iPhone to many major American newspapers and media organizations. Through those submissions, I urged that government-side server infrastructure was essential, and that operational improvements were required.
However, GAFA/M — which at the time I referred to as “MAGA FAGA NHE” — did not appear to establish direct contact with individual political figures. Even now, within the legal and institutional framework, progress appears to have been limited to developments such as the acquisition of X, with no clear prospect of broader structural improvement.
Because I submitted rare and highly significant footage of iPhone compromise to American media outlets, it is possible that intelligence-related groups connected to hedge-fund interests, or groups bearing intelligence-like names or characteristics, may have acquired a continuing obligation to observe my online activity. Their exact status remains unclear.
From a governmental standpoint, I had already requested in 2022, through social media and also directly to the White House, the development of government-level infrastructure capable of blocking unlawful or hostile IP traffic before it enters the domestic environment. However, there appeared to be no meaningful progress at that stage.
As a result, it may have become necessary, through these means, to communicate these matters even to hedge-fund-related actors.
Their current posture may be closer to confusion and avoidance than to coordinated resolution.
With the emergence of instruction-driven AI systems, groups resembling extreme-left actors appear to move in and around my surroundings. Without my prior knowledge, my local area appears to contain many such actors, and this has caused serious local difficulties and repeated trouble.
I am also deeply concerned that political leaders around the world do not appear to understand the basic physical reality of the Internet: that, at its foundation, it is not an abstract political space, but a communications infrastructure ultimately dependent on cables, telephone lines, utility poles, exchange points, servers, and routing systems.
In other words, the Internet is often treated as if it were an immaterial public forum, while its actual structure remains a physical and technical network. This lack of understanding among political leaders creates a serious policy-level risk.
The material attached here represents part of video footage that I had produced as a personal hobby.
The footage showing the iPhone being severely hacked would, at the time, have been understood as a zero-day-class vulnerability.
It has also been stated that the iPhone contained code elements dating back even to the 1980s. The issue was reportedly addressed by a team associated with Google’s Ian Beer, in material that, on the surface, appeared almost like a hobby-style technical video.
A review of Ian Beer’s account shows similar reproductions of cracking or vulnerability demonstrations.
ーーー
Within this context, the term “minor hacking” appears. Such activity is, in reality, relatively widespread.
Similarly, it is possible for unauthorized actors to install illicit servers and remotely switch functions between enabled and disabled states during operation.
This represents one of the foundational concepts behind the present large-scale expansion of hacking techniques. In its earlier form, such activity did not necessarily generate direct financial assets. The dominant pattern was often found in online environments — that is, within server-side fields provided or distributed by third parties, now commonly referred to as cloud environments — where users sought to obtain an unfair or “invincible” position within a given service.
However, the interception of cryptocurrency or related assets constitutes a far more serious criminal matter. It is true that certain forms of unauthorized online modification may allow individuals to use content without payment. Yet such conduct is not necessarily the primary target that a government server framework should address.
Rather, if distribution companies are able to cooperate with, or provide server-side capacity to, government authorities, it would be appropriate for those companies to establish controlled servers for online modification and tampering research, specifically for lawful white-hat foundational training.
This is conceptually similar to the customization of motorcycles or automobiles. It also resembles the way traffic may be temporarily regulated when government officials or authorized entities pass through public roads. In such cases, ordinary citizens may be required to stop or yield due to the passage of an authority-bearing group.
Accordingly, if a content distributor prepares dedicated servers for online modification research, the structure would, in practical terms, remain broadly comparable to ordinary communications environments. The relevant distinction lies in purpose, authorization, and scope.
The proposed government-side focus should therefore be limited to the investigation of international crime, terrorism, and sect-related organizational activity. Groups engaged in lawful foundational research, cybersecurity education, or white-hat technical learning should not be treated as targets of such governmental monitoring or intervention.
The central point is that controlled research environments for online modification should be separated from hostile or criminal infrastructure. Lawful technical study should remain outside the enforcement target, while government capability should be directed toward genuinely harmful networks, organized criminal activity, terrorism, and covert sect-style operations.
ーーー
-Additional term
# Notice for Use of Government-Side Server Infrastructure
This server environment is provided for authorized governmental, institutional, and lawful research purposes only.
Access to this infrastructure is subject to monitoring, verification, and operational review. Any use of this environment must remain within the scope of approved activities, including cybersecurity research, white-hat technical training, controlled online-modification testing, and investigations relating to international crime, terrorism, organized hostile activity, or sect-related operations.
Users are strictly prohibited from using this environment for unauthorized intrusion, asset interception, credential theft, financial manipulation, unlawful surveillance, or interference with civilian communications.
This infrastructure is not intended to target lawful researchers, students, engineers, white-hat groups, or ordinary civilian users engaged in legitimate technical study.
All activity conducted through this environment may be logged, segmented, reviewed, or suspended where necessary for security, legal compliance, or protection of public infrastructure.
By accessing or using this server environment, the user acknowledges that the system is operated under governmental authority and that misuse may result in restriction, referral, or further action by the competent authorities.
This system is provided as a controlled technical field, not as a platform for private exploitation.
コメント
コメントを投稿