Warning to hedge funds, military authorities, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, developers, development companies, and security-sector businesses.

---

Developer groups should understand that, even if they wait, no fundamental and comprehensive transformation will simply arrive on its own. They need to identify a suitable legislator and organize the matter, as a business proposal, around the necessity of government-operated server infrastructure.

Ordinarily, politicians tend to gravitate toward long-established circles: the military-industrial sector, oil interests, and advanced research universities. Politicians exist to be driven hard and used. It may be preferable to find someone who is clearly not tied to Eastern European or Russian networks.

However, even where such ties exist, if it can be conveyed that the Soviet structure still seeks to destroy entire regions once regarded as part of the West, then even politicians of Eastern European or Russian background — or anyone else — may be eager to support budget allocation for government servers designed to prevent exploitation. They would do so because it could be presented as their own achievement and might help them aim for the next ministerial post.

In this case, the greatest advantage of making full use of politicians is that they possess networks with other countries. In Asia, this could include Japan, Taiwan, engineering universities, and highly specialized business operators that may already be relatively close to government. Through political channels, further universities and institutions could be identified individually. Across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, India, and, after rigorous screening and potentially even higher levels of screening, China, it may become possible to invite companies and engineers into this framework.

What form of organization is desirable will depend on future developments.

Companies such as Boeing appear to understand flight operations through systems resembling Google Maps, and they seem to have sold such systems to other companies. A major reason appears to be the desire to collect flight data. Such data seems to be commercially sellable. However, the entities purchasing it may, in substance, be mafia-linked enterprises. When a Sect is involved, an entity may appear at first glance to be a legitimate company.

In the United States alone, mafia organizations are said to obtain tens of billions of dollars through specialized fraud schemes. In order to continue confusion, they may sell essentially meaningless flight-operation systems to such front companies. This can trap the situation in a fixed state and preserve an environment where individuals can continue to be remotely directed one by one.

If legislation were passed to regulate the sale and use of flight-operation systems that behave improperly within these Google Maps-like structures, and if all international systems were restored to three-point GPS positioning, then prohibited operations would become impossible.

Your industry appears, after developing what is called AI, to have continued offering investors a faint dream, anticipating that stock prices would rise. Yet if one assumes that the fires in California, and the smoke from Canada, were remotely instructed while being disguised as AI activity, then it should be clear that such systems can no longer be left alone in the way firearms have been left alone.

I am neither an enemy nor an ally. I simply want to punish what is malicious and intolerable. I have done nothing to anyone, yet I appear to have been continuously harmed by malice.

If states around the world reach agreement on exploitation, and if fraudulent domains, unclear domains, IP addresses showing improper behavior, and even telephone numbers used in international criminal activity can be prevented from crossing borders — and then further screened domestically — even simple hacking would become impossible.

In that case, this would not be a software-based system. Rather, it would involve an external industrial-robot-type mechanism. Only when terms used for criminal communication, such as drug-trafficking language, are detected within servers should a human be permitted to view that communication. If logs unrelated to criminals are deleted, this would not constitute censorship.

The next remaining issue would be airports. Yet this too could be addressed through the introduction of lie-detection systems. What would remain after that is letters. Under the pretext of the increasing sophistication of international crime, envelopes and all forms of packaging could be standardized globally. Their contents could then be opened and inspected by industrial-robot-type mechanisms, followed by proper repackaging.

In that case, mafia activity would contract.

The underlying premise is that the concerns held by all of you have now reached the point where even the Japanese government itself may reasonably be viewed with suspicion at the level of government-scale analysis. That is my position.

Before the Second World War, at the height of Japan’s territorial expansion, Japanese-language education was implemented from the Korean Peninsula to the Dalian region of China and the former Manchukuo. If Japan lost the Pacific War, Chiang Kai-shek and his wife Soong Mei-ling appear to have held ambitions to apply those assets next. They were part of the group that fled from present-day Taiwan to Hawaii.

Although this was not the Yalta Conference, it was a similar kind of meeting involving the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union, with a Chinese faction also participating. In this context, whether that faction was truly a separate faction is itself questionable.

In other words, large numbers of fluent Japanese speakers existed in China even before the Pacific War. After Japan’s defensive capacity had been reduced to its lowest level by the United States and Britain-related countries, it would have been entirely possible for such individuals to become involved with the Japanese government.

As the Japanese groups that handled the immediate postwar settlement aged and disappeared, groups of Chinese origin may have begun embedding themselves within Japanese governmental structures. Japan may therefore have entered a crisis even immediately after the Pacific War.

The American and British strategy toward Japan was forcibly ended in 1952. When the Allied commander known as MacArthur was forced into a position where he had to shift toward the Korean War, Japan was left, in substance, with large numbers of Chinese individuals fluent in Japanese. Even if repatriation programs existed in some cases, unlawful border crossing would have been far easier in that era than people tend to imagine.

In this case, each country’s military will likewise require operations to replace the internal personnel of compromised governments. Through the establishment of local structures, compromised individuals would be arrested and replaced. This is a case in which the military would drive politicians hard and make use of them. American politicians would be compelled to meet with politicians from Europe and Asia.

If 40 billion dollars in assets are disappearing in the United States alone through specialized fraud schemes, then this should be understood as an investment aimed at writing off, neutralizing, or recovering from that loss.

Giving politicians duties to perform is your right. This is not a matter of otaku groups experimenting, DIY-style, with questions such as “what about security?” in response to issues occurring on a global scale.

You may be misreading the situation. It is as if you are under the illusion that the internet exists only around Silicon Valley. That is an extremely otaku-like, short-sighted way of seeing the world.

From my perspective, Japanese automobiles do not appear to be a threat to another country’s industry. They are merely oddly shaped objects driving around nearby. Yet if another country regards them as a threat, then the threat posed by internet exploits can be understood as belonging to the same category.

ーーー

---

Government Integrated English Draft

Warning to hedge funds, military authorities, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, developers, development companies, and security-sector businesses.

Developer groups should understand that fundamental and comprehensive transformation will not simply arrive by waiting. What is required is to identify appropriate lawmakers and organize the matter as a formal governmental and industrial proposal: namely, that government-operated server infrastructure is now necessary.

If as much as 40 billion dollars in assets are being lost in the United States alone through specialized fraud schemes, then the construction of stronger governmental security infrastructure should not be treated as an ordinary expense. It should be understood as an investment intended to offset, neutralize, and prevent the continuation of that loss.

Assigning concrete duties to politicians is your right. This is not a matter for small technical or “otaku” groups to approach through improvised, DIY-style experimentation while asking, in isolation, “What about security?” in response to problems that are global in scale.

You may be misreading the structure of the issue. There appears to be an illusion that the internet exists only in and around Silicon Valley. That is a narrow, insular, and technically provincial way of viewing the world.

From my perspective, Japanese automobiles do not appear to be a threat to another country’s industry. They may appear merely as unfamiliar objects moving through the surrounding environment. Yet if another state or industrial sector regards them as a strategic threat, then internet-based exploitation should be understood in the same category. The threat is not defined only by the intent of the producer or developer. It is also defined by the scale of dependency, systemic exposure, and vulnerability created in other countries, industries, and public institutions.

Ordinarily, politicians tend to gravitate toward long-established interests: the military-industrial sector, oil interests, advanced research universities, and major institutional networks. Politicians exist to be driven hard and made to perform their duties. It may be preferable to identify lawmakers who are not connected to Eastern European or Russian networks.

However, even where such ties exist, if it can be made clear that Soviet-type structures may still seek to destabilize entire regions once regarded as part of the Western sphere, then even politicians of Eastern European or Russian background — or others with comparable institutional interests — may be willing to support budget allocation for government servers designed to prevent exploitation. They may do so because such a project can be presented as their achievement and may support their path toward a future ministerial or senior governmental post.

In this context, the greatest advantage of making full use of politicians is that they possess international networks. In Asia, this may include Japan, Taiwan, engineering universities, and highly specialized business operators that may already have proximity to government institutions. Through political channels, further universities, companies, and expert groups can be identified individually.

Across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, India, and, after rigorous screening and potentially even higher levels of screening, China, it may become possible to invite selected companies and engineers into this framework. The exact form of organization should be determined according to future developments and security requirements.

Companies such as Boeing appear to understand flight operations through systems resembling Google Maps, and similar systems appear to have been sold to other companies. One major reason may be the collection of flight data. Such data appears to be commercially valuable and sellable.

However, the entities purchasing or operating such systems may, in substance, be connected to criminal or mafia-linked structures. When a Sect-type network is involved, an entity may appear at first glance to be a legitimate company, while functioning in practice as a front organization.

In the United States alone, mafia organizations are reportedly able to obtain tens of billions of dollars through specialized fraud schemes. In order to prolong confusion, such organizations may cause apparently legitimate front companies to purchase or operate flight-operation systems that have little meaningful operational value. This may trap the situation in a fixed state while preserving an environment in which individuals can continue to be remotely directed one by one.

For this reason, legislation should be considered to regulate the sale, deployment, and use of flight-operation systems that behave improperly within Google Maps-like operational environments. If such systems were prohibited and if international aviation operations were restored to stricter GPS-based positioning principles, then prohibited conduct would become far more difficult to execute.

Your industry appears to have continued giving investors a faint dream after developing what is called AI, anticipating that stock prices would rise as a result. Yet if one assumes that major fires, smoke events, or similar disruptions could be remotely instructed while being disguised as AI activity, then it should be understood that such systems can no longer be left unattended in the way firearms have been left unattended.

I am neither an enemy nor an ally. I simply wish to punish what is malicious and intolerable. I have done nothing to anyone, yet I appear to have been continuously harmed by hostile and malicious conduct.

If states around the world reach agreement on the prevention of exploitation, and if fraudulent domains, unclear domains, IP addresses showing improper behavior, and telephone numbers used in international criminal activity can be prevented from crossing borders — and then further screened domestically — even ordinary hacking operations would become significantly more difficult.

In such a case, the central mechanism should not be conceived merely as software. Rather, it should involve an external industrial-robot-type structure, operating under legally defined conditions. Only when communications contain terms or patterns associated with serious criminal activity, such as drug trafficking or organized crime, should human review be permitted. If logs unrelated to criminal activity are deleted, such a system would be materially different from indiscriminate censorship.

The next remaining issue would be airports. This area may require additional verification mechanisms, including lie-detection systems or other advanced screening methods. After that, the remaining channel would be physical correspondence. Under the rationale of preventing increasingly sophisticated international crime, envelopes and packaging formats could be standardized internationally. Their contents could be inspected through industrial-robot-type mechanisms and then properly repackaged.

In that scenario, mafia activity would contract.

The broader premise is that sufficient material now exists for governments to view even certain Japanese governmental structures with suspicion at a strategic level. Before the Second World War, during Japan’s period of maximum territorial expansion, Japanese-language education was implemented from the Korean Peninsula to the Dalian region of China and the former Manchukuo.

If Japan lost the Pacific War, Chiang Kai-shek and his wife Soong Mei-ling may have held ambitions to apply those linguistic and administrative assets. They belonged to political networks that later moved through Taiwan and Hawaii.

Although this was not the Yalta Conference itself, comparable great-power meetings involved the United States, Britain, the Soviet Union, and Chinese factions. In this context, whether those factions were truly separate or independently aligned remains questionable.

In other words, large numbers of fluent Japanese speakers existed in China before the Pacific War. After Japan’s defensive capacity was reduced to its lowest level by the United States and Britain-related powers, it would have been entirely possible for such individuals or networks to become involved with Japanese governmental structures.

As the Japanese groups that handled the immediate postwar settlement aged and disappeared, foreign-aligned networks may have begun embedding themselves within Japanese governmental institutions. Japan may therefore have entered a crisis even in the early postwar period.

The American and British strategy toward Japan was effectively curtailed in 1952. When the Allied commander known as MacArthur was compelled to shift focus in relation to the Korean War, Japan was left, in practical terms, with a substantial population of fluent Japanese-speaking individuals whose institutional loyalties may not have been adequately screened. Even where repatriation programs existed, unlawful border crossing and informal settlement would have been far easier in that era than many people now assume.

For this reason, each country’s military may require operations designed to identify and replace compromised internal structures within government. Through the establishment of local structures, compromised actors would be removed through lawful authority and replaced with reliable personnel. This is a case in which the military would make full use of politicians. American politicians would be compelled to meet with politicians from Europe, Asia, and other regions in order to establish the necessary channels.

The proper response is therefore not for private developer groups to continue improvising security measures on their own. The proper response is to require political leadership, legislative authority, public funding, screened international cooperation, and government-level server infrastructure capable of addressing exploitation as a matter of national and international security.

by “the unfamiliar appearance of the vehicles,” I mean that the design of vehicles driving within Japan is, to me, aesthetically unappealing.

デベロッパー各グループは、待っていても基本的な総合的な変革はやってこない。適当なLaw メーカーを見つけ出し、政府のサーバーが必要である。と、企業としても案件を纏めさせる事だ。通常、政治家は、大昔から付き合いがある軍産産業、オイル、先進研究をする大学へ行きたがるものだ。政治家は酷使して、利用する為に存在している。絶対に東欧系やロシア系ではない者が良い可能性がある。ただ、そうであっても、 同じ帰属でも、ソ連は未だ西側とされた地域ごと破壊したがっている事を伝えられるなら、実態が東欧、ロシア系の政治家でもその他でも、エクスプロイトを防ぐ為の政府のサーバーを構築する予算を充てる事に大喜びで参加したがってくるだろう。自分の成果であるかのような次の大臣のポストが狙えるからだ。この場合、政治家を酷使出来る最大の特典は、他国とのネットワークがある点で、アジアなら、日本を始めとして台湾などの工科大学、専門性の高い事業者、こう言った物は政府に比較的近い可能性があり、個別に更に大学を探せる可能性がある。政治同士のチャンネルで欧州、北米、南米、アジア、インド、各-スクリーニングを徹底した後、可能性として更に高いスクリーニングを課し中国、の企業、エンジニアを呼べる点だ。これはどうゆう組織化が望ましいかは、今後次第だ。ボーイングのような企業は、グーグルマップのような物で飛行オペレーションをしているのを理解しており、それを他の企業に販売したようだ。これは飛行データを集めたい事が大きい理由のようだ。それらは販売出来るようだ。しかし売っている先は、やはり企業の実態は、マフィアかもしれない。Sectが関わると正常な企業に一見見える。アメリカだけで、400億ドルの特殊詐欺をマフィアは得ている為、混乱を継続させる為、そのような出先機関となっている企業にほとんど意味のないフライトオペレーションを販売する可能性がある。この状態にスタックさせる事が出来る。継続し遠隔で個人個人に指揮が可能な状態を維持出来るだろう。 このグーグルマップのような物に更に不正な挙動を取る飛行オペレーションシステムの販売や利用を規制し、3点即位のGPSに全て国際的に戻す。と言う事を法案で可決させると、禁止されている事はできなくなる。皆さんの業態はAI と言う物を開発した時点で、淡い夢を見ると言う事を投資家に相変わらず与え、株価が上がる事を見越しており、 行っているようですが、カリフォルニアも、カナダからの火災も煙も遠隔からAIに偽装し指示したと仮定する時、それらはもはや、絶対に銃のように放置出来ないと分かるはずだ。僕は敵でも味方でもない。むかつく物を成敗したいだけである。僕は誰にも何もしていないが、悪意に加害され続けていたようだ。エクスプロイトが世界で国家間で、合意され、不正なドメインや。よくわからないドメイン、不正な挙動を取るIP、不正な国際犯罪で使う電話番号すら、越境出来ず、更に内陸でも検閲する時、単純なハッキングすら不可能になる。この場合、ソフトウエアーではなく、産業ロボット型の外部のロボットにサーバー内で会話や、麻薬取引に使う言葉を検出した場合のみ、人間がその通信を閲覧して良い時、犯罪者以外のログを消すなら、検閲にならない。次に残るのは、空港。しかし、 それも嘘発見機を導入し、更に残るのは、手紙だ。国際犯罪の高度化と言う名目で、封筒、あらゆる、包装の形式を世界的に統一。それらの中身を開けて中身を産業用ロボット型のメカニズムで、中身を見ると言う事をする時、そして適切な再包装をする。 この場合、マフィアの活動は収縮する。更に前提に皆さんの懸念は政府規模では日本政府すら不審と考えられる題材が整った。そう考えている。日本は第二次世界大戦以前、最大領土時、日本語教育を朝鮮半島から中国の大連付近、旧満州国に施している。日本が太平洋戦争で敗北した場合、次にそれらを応用すると言う野心を蒋介石とその妻である宗美齢は保持していたようだ。現在の台湾から、ハワイに逃げたグループである。アメリカ、イギリス、ソ連が会合した。ヤルタ会談とは異なるが、同じような会談で中国の分派が参加している。この場合、分派がかどうか？怪しい と言う事です。つまり日本語堪能者が、大量に中国に太平洋戦争以前から存在し、日本の防衛力がイギリス関係国と、アメリカが最低値化した後、日本政府に関わる事は十分に出来ただろう。太平洋戦争の戦後を処理した日本人グループが高齢で去っていくと、実態は中国人グループが、日本政府に巣食い出したはずで、太平洋戦争直後でも危機に陥ったはずだろう。イギリスとアメリカの日本への戦略は、1952年で強制的に終了し、マッカッサーと呼ばれたアメリカの連合軍の司令は、朝鮮戦争の指揮に転任せざるを得ない状態に陥ると、日本は実態は日本語堪能な中国人を大量に残す事になる。帰国事業を行なったケースがあるとしても、不正な越境は人が考えるよりずっと簡単な時代でしょう。 この場合、同じく、その政府の中身をリプレースするオペレーションが各国の軍に必須になる。現地組織の確立によって、逮捕し中身を入れ替える事だ。これは軍が、政治家を酷使し使うケースだ。アメリカの政治家は欧州やアジアの政治家と会談する必要に駆られる。アメリカだけで、400億ドルの資産が、特殊詐欺で消えているのであれば、それを帳消しにする為の投資になると言う話しだ。