複雑性の連続から、今回の投稿では最低限の清書や意味が即-理解可能な見直しも
行われていません。 既存の概念を全て超えた攻撃主体がある場合。それに沿った考え方をしている為、また現在の通常の政治手法は全く役立たないと判断しています。既存の政治手法と概念を全く無視した手法を考案している事をご理解下さい。
こちらで投稿されている物は、個人的な侮辱行為などAIの指示によって反復し周囲に来る存在に気づき、2000年には書き込みサイトにあった情報から、更にそれらが都市伝説ではない。子供の囲い込みなど事実である。と言う25年以上の情報の実質的な収集と経験。そして、人生を遡って見た時に起きた状況を情報化、更に対応可能な法制度化を明記していますが、私個人のコミュケーション、コミュニティーには、これらを制度的に資金的なバックアップを保持し行っていると言う事が一切なく、
主に老作後倦怠感。疲労感と言う症状に幼少期には気づき、人生の先行きに関して危機感をずっと持っていたまま。この年齢になるまでに障害基礎年金のみで生活を父としている男性に過ぎない。と言う実態もあり、これらの『国際的な活動をする民間-個人のシンクタンク』と言う法的な地位の確定、手当ての割り当てを行う初動の人員の配置。
国際的な民間防衛。と言う存在もいて良いわけで、この『国際的な民間防衛』と言う枠組みの中の、『国際的な民間-個人シンクタンク』と言う手当ても発生する必要性がある。
と言う状態、法的枠組みが必要な事をご理解下さい。
また、新規のコミュニティーに属せる包括した発足の為の法的枠組みの為の、新規の人的割り当て、人的配置、こう言った物も同時並行的に考えていただけない と、情報だけを作り出し何も恩恵がない時。私はただの使い捨てのような物になってしまい、人権の侵害に抵触すると言う事も念頭においてください。元々収益を求めて始めた事ではないものの、国際的な国家の不作為を補う。と言う大きな責任を負う状況に陥っており、無給では全く不可能である前提がそもそもある事をご理解ください。
また、民間-個人シンクタンク と言う登録された存在として国際機関。仮にNATOなどに登録される場合。日本人なら、日本の防衛予算で私は民間-個人シンクタンク。実質給与を受け取ると言う存在になり得るだけの情報の提供、収集を行っていると言う実績をご理解下さい。日本の政治家はTVにもっと攻撃され続けていた為、それをも全ての放送局に説明し、状況が緩和されていったなど絶望的な情勢からの回復など、『恩賞』と言う形でも認可を求めたい。これは国際的に、
NATOが仮に管轄する場合。国際的な共通の安全保障と言うアジェンダになり得るはずである為、多国間で共通の法的な枠組みで可能な範囲に見える。
・つまり、国際的な民間防衛の発足です。市民における広域の防衛組織の
発足と活動に関するアジェンダです。
この場合、『国家、国際的な情勢において政府が独自に解消する事が不可能であった問題に対処し、解消させた。』と言う『重大な功績』を与える。と言う事は法的な枠組みで私の場合には、可能に見える。
ここまでは可能な物に見える。また、急に海外の政治家にも報告もしておりまだまだ、各政治チームで整理が追いつかない可能性もありますが、私もこの7年くらいを費やしてきた結果、辛うじて生み出している新しい発想であって、これ以上時間をかけたくない。父も高齢であると言う実情があります。出来れば海外の政治家、そのバックアップチームにも対応を依頼したい案件です。
※国際的な国民防衛。と言う大枠の中に存在する。私 民間-個人シンクタンク という形とその法的枠組みの構成の依頼に関する情報の提供です。
・将来的なRiskの放置をしない目的から、継続しこの反セクト法に関する問題だけではなく、民間の個人のシンクタンクかつ重大な情報、法的な枠組みの事例を生み出した存在。と言う『地位的』な継続した名誉も含めて部署の設立を依頼したいと考えています。
つまり、『国際的な民間防衛』を国際的な法的枠組みで大枠で扱い、その中にある部署。『民間-個人シンクタンク』を扱う、部署の設立までの話です。管理、手当てや、恩賞を要求、要請する部署についての話です。
---
その中で、私は障害基礎年金を受け取っている。労働不能と診断され、精神障害1級の診断を受け、実際にそのような所存/状態であります。完全に自己や自我を失っていないものの、老作後倦怠感と言う物が強く現れ、抑うつや人生を通した、不安感から幻聴に近い。心から非常に否定的な声、思想、心の声に近い物が、聞こえる場合がある。と言う状態で、そう言った診断になっていますが、
この前提にある老作後倦怠感が強い時、歳入があったとしても、日々の生活を成り立たせる。と言う事が非常に困難を抱えています。
国際的な民間防衛をまず設定し、その中に、民間-個人シンクタンク と言う枠組みは法的枠組みの構成において可能に見えるが、この戦争状態の最中、最大の対抗をしている1人の民間人。
と言う状態を認定するのは、法的には扱いがし難くく見えるものの、『女を長期-集団的に介した攻撃』と言う物を認識し、それに対し、国際的に軍事的な枠組みにおいて、制度的に反撃をする場合。この民間-個人シンクタンクへ、女性における身辺、世話係と言う物を配置する必要性が生じる。
重度の高い反撃になる為です。
・私の症状への対応 並び、私と言う、状態に対抗する存在が衰退するのではなく、法的に保護され比較的若い軍に所属している女性、または、新規の法において、社会制度から切り離したSectの中で更生した少女などと行動させる時、私個人なら症状への対応、並びに、攻撃手法に対し初動の重大な反撃が可能になります。長期戦略で行われた事を全て、無効化出来る為です。広範に少女を使う攻撃が存在する場合、軍や軍相当の組織が、未成年の少女。かなり低い年齢層でも社会制度から、切り離した場合。
司法制度で一切追及できないわけで、その国の裁量のみでそれらを扱う場合、
--
軍相当の組織で、交際状況を法的に実質許可された状況を作り出し、大規模な反撃が可能になります。
この中で、比較的若い軍、または軍相当組織に所属している女性とは、給与は通常の数倍。5~6倍。
通常の結婚生活を将来伴わない覚悟を持つ者、または30歳位までに過去を一般女性と同じく内密にして結婚する予定である、給与に還元する事を考えられる者。容姿は並。雑誌等のモデル等で現れるような存在ではなく、男性から見て好感が広範に沸く容姿と言う存在。または、離婚経験などがあり再婚を考えていない。などがまず想定されるだろう。
これは、反セクト法と言う物を見た時。それは扱い易い物ですが、
・政治的には、この古来の戦術のような。現代戦では女性を社会の中で密かに配下にする戦術のような物に対抗する考案は、現在の政治手法では急激に難しく感じる事を理解して書いています。
まずは、Sectから切り離し、次に、社会制度から切り離した存在を後。その国の法ではなく、『裁量のみ』で対象を扱う事が可能になると考えられる。この段階で、攻撃主体への大規模な反撃と言う物が可能になり、同時に世界の広域での同時に行える、反撃手法と考えられます。
と言うのは、中にはこの程度の攻撃があると考えられる為です。
少女によってアメリカの元海兵隊員が殺害を受けている可能性がある。
＜私は、調査状況の確認は出来ない為、これまでの国内の情勢の悪化を改善した経験から断定として情報を公表しています。＞
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/k84Ad40TQgA
9 year old girl accidentally kills shooting instructor with Uzi
1.2万回視聴
9 年前
僕はこれをアクシデントではなく意図的と考えている。これまでの子供が可能にしていた行動の戦略性に基づいた手法を見る時、この年齢期に、十分意図的にこのような殺人が可能である。と考えている。指示に絶対に従うと言う状態がある。
・東京の中心部で行われた強盗事件は、AIが指示した可能性があり、特に行く充てもなく重大な事件を起こした後、即座に逮捕されている。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lrmGxgMPZw
AIが情報を解析、簡単な指示を出すまでにゲームのコンテンツすら無作為に使った。と考えている。
https://youtu.be/EVB62SKaxGo?t=200
AIが見つけ出す。『酷似性』 と言う物に非常に沿った場所です。
私は、この事件の顛末が5階の日本のベランダの手すりを悠々歩いている。と言う点に着目し高所階を狙った常習犯であろうと推論を立て、高市早苗のコンタクトフォームに送り、自衛隊の増員が石破内閣で為された。真夏は警戒せず、網戸だけで日本は寝ている部屋が存在する。2階でもそのようにして寝ていた為、その際に侵入し少額の資金を盗み出す時。5000円や1万円程度では事件性にならず、記憶違いと言う物で済まされる可能性がある、として警告しました。
常習犯である為、ボットがそれらを見つけだし、これらに強盗を行わせた。この最も映像で分かり易い物以前から、似たような強盗があったようです。それはAIが指示していた為 と考えている。
・Citizen Lab
グーグルのAIで、Citizen Labを調べると、カナダのサイバーセキュリティ研究機関とされる組織では、Penlink / Cobwebs の Webloc について、広告由来の位置情報から、世界中の多数の端末を監視できる仕組みが存在すると分析しています。
これらの派生した、ソフトウェアは多数存在し、イスラエルでは陰謀論に対抗する為、これらのソフトウェアを構築したが、指摘している社会主義残党やシベリア抑留兵の子孫、これらのハイブリッド型のマフィアのフロント企業等にも誤って、販売したのではないか？と推測しています。イスラエルやユダヤ系ヨーロッパ人、アメリカ人には、911WTCビルの崩壊における陰謀論とは、重度の高い許し難い行為。情報の流布であると、取られていたようである為、それらにとっての、差別主義者を独自に見つけ報復すると言うイデオロギーが非常に優先されたようである。
Eron Maskの紹介では少なくともそう言った記事が掲載された。
しかし、当時ではボットの生成した物か？判断が出来ません。
<民間-個人では 包括した予測を立てられるが、個別の詳細における証拠が取りにくい為、または法的な証拠を取る事が不可能である為、全体像の掌握、把握、予測、未知の敵対構造の予測、反撃手法の構築、考案に特化している。とお考えください。
全体像としては、撹乱攻撃、と破壊活動、そして戦闘行為であり、現地にいるSectはToolに過ぎず、西側と考えられている地域の破壊が、目的であると、私、個人では断定している。何が起きているか？把握を困難化し、政府人員もSect化をし、事実上の国家転覆、西側とされた国々の、破壊、が目的である。潜伏状態から攻撃を繰り返すものの、交戦をする組織では現場ない為、この点で優位性を保持する時、戦闘行為の鎮圧が可能になると推測しています。私は重篤なストレス状態から、グランドセフトオートを通常通りプレイし、動画をアップロードします。私の生命もこの1年でも複数回、明らかな 工作活動 に見える。手法によって、危機に瀕した事があり、いつAIや他者の指示通り動く者等に死亡させられるか？一切不明である。>
次に2010年頃に日本のドラマに出演していた少女がいる。特に身体が大きく大人びた印象にさせていた。
この上記の映像はピンクのホットパンツと言う、画像-映像がリンクした膨大な情報があるにも関わらず、＜アルゴリズム＞で現れたわけですが、意図的に少女向けにジーンズや服飾を仮に中国等で裁縫し大量に輸出し大人の女性のミニチュア版のような存在を大量に作り上げているのが事実の場合。
ピンクのホットパンツ。10歳前後向け。と言う物に着目が出来る。
女性アナウンサーは、より若い。非常に若い女に恰好だけで気を取られている！
と言うニュアンスの言葉使いでニュースを紹介するケースがあるものの、実態はもっと難しい事だと理解するのは現在の政治手法では難しい事です。
共時性ではなく、書類整理上、計画された同時多発性-長期攻撃性である。と考えている。この男性がこれまで書いてきたような意図的な愛情深い視点を投げかける少女などに囲い込まれ、いずれそういった少女をアジアなどに地域を絞り検索し出し、結果、ターゲット化されたのではないか？とプロファイリングをしています。
一回インターネット上で見始める。視線を投げかけられる。繰り返すと徐々に記憶層に恋愛と性的対象としてアドレナリンが誘発する色や形を大人の女性を模擬しても『服飾の在り方』でレイヤー化されると考えている。つまり本能的な記憶としては繰り返されると、次に見ても恋愛や性的関係を持ちたいと感じる、つまり多種の効果を作り出せる攻撃手法の話です。
この男性は明らかに高揚感があるように感じる。
被害者の名前は、チャールズ・ヴァッカ ですから。チャールズ皇太子を意味させ、
ヴァッカは、日本語でバカ＜Vacca ではなく、BAKA＞と読める時。各国の諜報機関がカルトグループにより着目し捜査するか？こう言った暗喩を施すと考えている。
コロンバイン銃撃事件は、コロンバイン、コロンビア、コロンブス、キューバ、コカイン、
旧ソビエトか？と、即、プロファイルが可能な範囲の物ですが、着目されなかったようだ。
一回、銃撃事件を発生させると同様のパターン化がアメリカ全体で生じ始めます。
すると、シベリア抑留兵の非帰国者。その子孫が高度な諜報活動と訓練を受けていると想定する時、
ドイツ人。日本人。アメリカ人でも、チャールズと言う名称を意図的に攻撃する事は非常に分かり易いプロファイリングの一つでしょう。または社会主義圏の存在のどれでも当てはまるが、チャールズを攻撃したい者なら、アメリカ人、自国が裏切ったと思っているイギリス人、ドイツ人、または日本人と言うグループは非常に分かり易い。
私は、256BITのパスワードのようなランダムな文字列で検索を2005年頃にかけた際。『私はソ連に残る。』と、書かれた当時のブログのような物を発見した。
旧社会主義圏では、まだソ連と言う名称で自国を呼ぶのか？と考えていたが、
256BITのパスワードのような物でHITすると言う事は、それがそのサイトのURLや検索で現れる要素に非常に近かかった、サーバーであり、私に接続していた為、HITし易かった。当時のハッキングのサーバー超え用。ステップ用の基本のサーバーであっただろう。
こう言った順番で見る時、ピンクのホットパンツ。周囲の少女の行動様式。と言う物を考える時、
チャールズと言う男性が死亡した場合。コロンバインと言う文字列から考えると、暗喩性である。と考える方が自然である。
意図的な暗喩性であると想定する時、少女による殺人の可能性を考えないといけません。
この場合、これが事実の場合。非常に、深刻な事態である事が理解されるでしょう。
9歳であれば、無垢で無力と言うイメージを与えやすいがわざわざ銃の発射場に来るような人物が、不注意を起こすか？と言えば限りなく低いと考える方が普通だろう。
5歳とか6歳が起こしそうな事ですが、9歳と言えばまず、指示に従い反動で死亡させられるほどの連射させるほど、トリガーを焦って引き続けると言うミスはせず、銃をしっかり持つと言う事は考えれるだろう。トリガーを引いたが、状況的にはグリップは握っているように思える話しなわけです。反動でグリップが離れてしまった。銃が飛んで行った際に頭部に命中したわけではなく、
状況は限りなく、腕を支点に反動した、または反動させたように見えるわけです。
誤ってトリガーを引いた場合、銃も飛んでいく事が想定されるが、この状態では頭部への命中は命中率は低く、命中は限りなくし難いと思えるが、意図的な反動をさせる事が可能なら頭部への命中は訓練後に可能である。銃がHOLDした状態。握った状態から離れた場合。少女も重症、死亡をしていないと、非常に不自然である。
トリガーは引いたが、反動。銃をHOLDは続けているような内容ではある。
これは僕はUZIと言う銃を操作した事がないので分かりませんが。
そういった物を扱う場所に行く親が、9歳児で少女に自動小銃を持たせる場所に行く場合。説明を事前にしないか？と言えば非常に不自然だろう。
少女、ピンクのホットパンツ。と言う物で世論は一斉に情けない男性が、無垢な少女と話していると、誤って死亡したと言う印象に飛びつくはずだろう。また暗にそういった話題になっていた。それが狙いだろう。すると男性性はアメリカで更に下がる事が予測出来る。
CNNなどの女性キャスター等は、『アフガニスタンで10年程の経験がある海兵隊員が9歳児のセクシーなホットパンツ。フェニミズムがかなり若い少女にも台頭した時代！女性性やセクシズムが浸透したわ！ピンクのパンツを履いた最近の女の子にでかい男が、どこか興奮気味で、誤射をさせ死亡させたわ！』と言いたげな アップビートに楽し気に話していた。
しかし、カルトグループの実態を研究するほど、そういった安易な話しでは無い事に気づきます。また10歳位であると、さほど無垢ではなくなってくると言う記憶がある。
4~5歳でカルトグループ、SECT、は十分な工作活動も可能です。10歳なら深夜に幽霊に成りすまし行動が可能です。友人と路地を走行している時、1996年に5~6歳に見える少年がフードを被り真冬に赤い3輪車に乗って顔が影で見えない。演出されたように、16歳の少年が数台走っている真横を恐れる事もなく、深夜0時に通過していった事がある。
私は、本当の幽霊を見てしまったか。。と10秒ほど背中が氷付いた。先頭を走っている友人は、その少年の顔を見ようとしていた。3台の中、真ん中にいる少年は、ロープロファイルを行う。『また、そんな事言って俺を騙そうとしているよー。』と、それまでに言った事や、
そこまで自己を過小評価した態度を出す事がなかった。
周辺は日本で言うカラオケPUB。PUBにカラオケが付いた、そのような経営をしている。荒れた家庭もあるような地域ですので、そういった家庭の子供だろう。と、僕は結論したが。顔を見ようとしていた、Sectではないであろう友人は全く気にしていなかったです。
土地柄を知っている為かもしれません。またはSectだったのかもしれません。分かりません。Positiveな性格でそのような事が起きても大概気にしない。後に引きずらない。と言う性格をしていた。つまり深く考えないSectではないであろう友人は、僕の2台先を走り、幽霊のような様子で深夜に3輪車で走る幼い。5~6歳に見える様子を目撃していたのを僕も後部から見ていたし、見た。とまでは言っていた。しかし、後日もなんだろねー。と言う位で、余り気にしていなかった。
問題は、恐れる事なく深夜の0時に1人で暗い路地で60㎞位で走行するバイク3台の横を
1m位の距離も無くすれ違う事が可能な者がいる。と言う事です。ほとんど真横。50㎝ほどの距離しか無かったように見えた。先頭で見ていたら、突然現れたわけではない為、外に出て来た、カラオケPUBの家の子供かなんかか。で、確信が持てた為、気にしていなかったのかもしれません。
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrIkarPCb6o
多くはそうだ。と当人が主張している映像ですが、動員と言う事を考える時、しかし私の調査では私の周囲で2020年を過ぎて、起きた事が含まれます。
このように幽霊人と言った感じで明るい東京の繫華街で甥とほぼ同一の恰好をした者、甥がいると一瞬錯誤するほど似せた人物が、路地の真ん中で、妙な様子で佇むなど起きた。
一歩も動かず、路地の真ん中で佇んでいた。
私の経験では子供が参加する為、この個別の人物を個々に調査する時、事実が分かると言う事なだけです。これらは疑心暗鬼も生む為、視聴には注意が要ります。この疑心暗鬼は、オーストラリアの若い女、当時高校生にも非常に起きているようだ。私にも起きています。これが生理学的に破壊が起きたと定義出来るポイントでもある。これは、当人がSectであり、手法を知っている為だろう、と考えている。私は、一個一個調べ理解していくうち、周囲に現れる人物像の多さから、疑心暗鬼に陥った。例えばTestの為、異様な笑い方、笑みを浮かべて歩いていると、全く同じようにして散歩に見える男がおり、すれ違う者がいた場合。以降、他でもしばしば起きれば、動員数がかなり多い。と感じるようになってくる。他にも様々なテストを繰り返した為です。この市では特に多いようだ。と民族団体がある事から考えている。周囲、4~5㎞、半径に100人～1000人でも十分に多い。また、例のオーストラリアの若い女は、Youtuberと言う物が文字列として不評に関する記事がある時、単に、ボットが攻撃対象にしただけだ。と考えている。
--
成美璃子と言う元少女 グラビアアイドル-モデルは確か、2010年頃 12歳。と言うグラビア本を発売しています。
https://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%83%8E%E3%83%BC%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E5%93%81-m1097579059-%E6%88%90%E6%B5%B7%E7%92%83%E5%AD%90-%E5%86%99%E7%9C%9F%E9%9B%86-12%E6%AD%B3/dp/B0CKLS4VRR
日本で国民的アイドルと日本の大手新聞社 読売新聞が、1面を使い取材で言い出したグループも同じような物です。特に国民の誰も その女のグループが日本らしいアイドルグループだ とは一言も言っていないが、そのように売り出されていた。
日本ではAKB48と呼び、販売していた。
https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%A4%A7%E5%B3%B6%E5%84%AA%E5%AD%90%E3%80%80Growing+up&sca_esv=fd283996c2cdb00b&udm=2&biw=987&bih=512&sxsrf=ANbL-n5Fo82L33buyMqMLsBlGB-ipUgKlQ%3A1781578258182&ei=ErowapXNCpGkvr0P3dOxmAo&ved=0ahUKEwiVnt-Z4IqVAxURkq8BHd1pDKMQ4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%E5%A4%A7%E5%B3%B6%E5%84%AA%E5%AD%90%E3%80%80Growing+up&gs_lp=Egtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZyIZ5aSn5bO25YSq5a2Q44CAR3Jvd2luZyB1cEikuAlQtvEIWIS1CXAHeACQAQCYAWmgAZUOqgEEMjcuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCDqAClgeoAgDCAg0QABiABBgEGLEDGIMBwgIQEAAYgAQYigUYBBixAxiDAcICBxAAGIAEGATCAgoQABiABBgEGLEDwgIIEAAYgAQYsQPCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAcICEhAAGIAEGIoFGAQYJRixAxiDAcICBRAAGIAEwgIOEAAYgAQYigUYsQMYgwHCAgoQABiABBgXGLEDwgINEAAYgAQYFxixAxiDAcICEBAAGIAEGIoFGBcYsQMYgwGYAwGIBgGSBwQxMy4xoAeiLrIHBDEyLjG4B5MHwgcFMC42LjjIBy6ACAE&sclient=gws-wiz-img#sv=CAMSVhoyKhBlLWdjWXJiWGNhMnhvSHFNMg5nY1lyYlhjYTJ4b0hxTToObEZ3UXBTRnE4UWhWbU0gBCocCgZtb3NhaWMSEGUtZ2NZcmJYY2EyeG9IcU0YADABGAcg_fvB8QlKCBABGAEgASgB
この以下のURLは、AKB48と言う、淫靡なプロモーションビデオを使っていたグループであり、上記のURLの人物の数年後の状態が含まれる。と言う事です。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkHlnWFnA0c&list=RDlkHlnWFnA0c&start_radio=1
TVでかなり出演があり、全国的なコンビニエンスストアにポスターが張り出されるなど、異常性を感じていた。
ーーー
以下は上記の全ての翻訳を含んでいません。
ーーー
AI translation tools like ChatGPT exclude the term "minor." Therefore, the context is changed to "young women" or "women of all ages" before translation.
ーーー
Because the organization <Entity or actor >employs ancient tactics such as the domination of young women, which are the primary driving force behind the attacks, it is difficult to counter them with the liberal human rights concepts established in the late 20th and 21st centuries. Therefore, I propose methods that circumvent and can implement these human rights concepts.
ーーー
In Russian and Eastern European pornography, for longer girls as young as 13 years old appear and engage in sexual acts without any apparent issue. In this case, it is assumed that the expectation of young age,as monor to engage in sexual activity or expectation with older, adult members of the opposite sex is a perfectly normal sexual impulse in any region of the world. However, in the regions considered to be the West, due to the presence of parents and the difficulty of giving birth at a young age, relationships that existed legally ambiguously in the early 20th century, and the expectation and desire for sexual relationships that transcend physical age, are now defined as difficult to achieve. However,my strategies adevised to avoid these concepts that are considered new in the West.
ーーー
Here, in what is now considered the western region, we are using as a benchmark the kind of male-female relationship that was possible until the early 20th century, based on the fact that in the French Impressionist paintings, Gauguin's work depicting Spirit of the Dead Watching being seen during his time in Tahiti, which is housed and exhibited at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, a 13-year-old girl was his mistress. This is also based on my experience during a long stay in Jamaica when I was 21, where I noticed that girls who looked 13 or 14 were about 160cm tall and had the physique of mature women. They had the potential to grow into strong women of about more than 180cm.
ーーー
Proposal for the Recognition of an International Civilian Defence Framework and a Private Individual Think Tank
The materials I have posted and submitted are not merely personal opinions. They are based on more than twenty-five years of accumulated observation, experience, and information-gathering.
Since around 2000, I became aware that repeated acts of personal insult, harassment, and coordinated social pressure were not merely urban legends. Information already available on public message boards suggested that the enclosure and manipulation of children, as well as other forms of organised social interference, were real phenomena. Looking back over my own life, I have attempted to convert these experiences into structured information, and further into a possible legal and institutional framework capable of responding to them.
At the same time, I must make clear that I do not possess any institutional, financial, or organisational backing within my personal community or private communications. I am not supported by a foundation, political organisation, research institute, or private sponsor.
In reality, I am a man who has lived only on a Basic Disability Pension. Since childhood, I have suffered from what may be described as post-exertional malaise, chronic fatigue, and a persistent sense of anxiety regarding my future. Despite this condition, I have continued to gather, analyse, and structure information for many years.
For that reason, I believe it is necessary to consider the legal recognition of a new status: a private individual think tank operating within an international civilian defence framework.
This would mean recognising an individual civilian researcher or analyst who, without belonging to an existing institution, has nevertheless produced serious strategic information, legal concepts, and policy frameworks relevant to national and international security.
Such a person should not simply be treated as an unpaid source of information. If an individual has been placed in a position where he is effectively compensating for the inaction or insufficiency of national and international institutions, then continuing to extract information from him without recognition, protection, or material support may raise serious human-rights concerns.
Originally, I did not begin this work for profit. Nevertheless, the scale of responsibility has become far too large to continue on an unpaid basis. If the work concerns international security, civilian defence, anti-sect legislation, institutional corruption, and the prevention of future strategic risks, then some form of official status, stipend, salary, or reward system should be considered.
One possible framework would be an International Civilian Defence structure. Within that larger structure, there could be a registered category of Private Individual Think Tank.
If such a framework were connected to an international organisation, such as NATO or a NATO-related civilian defence mechanism, then a Japanese citizen registered under that structure could, in principle, receive support through Japan’s defence budget or another appropriate national budget. In such a case, I could be recognised not merely as a private person, but as a civilian strategic contributor whose work has produced substantial public value.
I would also request consideration of formal recognition in the nature of an award, honour, or compensatory grant. My position is that I have contributed to the easing of an extremely severe political and social situation by repeatedly explaining structural concerns, including to broadcasters and political figures, at a time when Japanese politicians were under intense media pressure and institutional dysfunction appeared severe.
In legal terms, it appears possible to recognise this as a serious contribution:
the independent identification, analysis, and partial resolution of problems that the state and the international system had been unable to resolve by themselves.
Such recognition would not necessarily require an extraordinary or unlawful framework. It could be handled as a matter of public contribution, civilian defence, national security, or international strategic assistance.
I have also begun reporting these concerns to foreign political figures. Because the volume and complexity of the material are substantial, it is possible that foreign offices and their staff may require time to understand the full structure. I myself have spent approximately seven years developing these ideas into a form that can be barely stated as a coherent legal and strategic proposal. I would therefore respectfully request that foreign legislators and their supporting teams consider providing assistance, review, and institutional backing.
The larger concept is as follows:
International Civilian Defence
→ including
Private Individual Think Tanks
→ including individuals who have produced major information, legal concepts, and strategic frameworks without institutional support.
The purpose is not limited to the current issue. It is also to prevent future risks from being ignored. A dedicated department or office should therefore be considered, so that individuals who generate significant civilian intelligence, legal frameworks, or strategic proposals can be recognised, protected, and supported on a continuing basis.
I must also state my medical and social circumstances clearly. I receive a Basic Disability Pension. I have been diagnosed as unable to work, and I have received a Grade 1 psychiatric disability diagnosis. Although I have not entirely lost my sense of self or identity, I suffer from severe post-exertional malaise, depressive symptoms, lifelong anxiety, and at times experiences close to auditory hallucinations, such as intensely negative internal voices, thoughts, or impressions.
When this post-exertional malaise is severe, even if income were available, maintaining ordinary daily life would remain extremely difficult.
Therefore, if a private individual think tank is to be recognised within an international civilian defence framework, it should not be treated merely as a symbolic title. It must include practical support: living assistance, administrative assistance, medical and psychological support, and a small team assigned to ensure that the individual can continue functioning without collapse.
In the present strategic emergency, the position of one civilian standing alone against a large-scale hostile pattern may be legally difficult to classify. Nevertheless, if organised pressure, gender-based manipulation, social interference, or the instrumentalisation of women are recognised as part of the hostile method, then the response must also include a gender-sensitive protective structure.
For this reason, I propose that properly vetted adult female support officers, welfare assistants, liaison personnel, or protection staff may be assigned to such a civilian think tank where necessary. Their role would not be private or sexual. Their role would be lawful, protective, administrative, welfare-based, and operationally supportive.
Such personnel could include women with experience in the military, defence administration, police-adjacent institutions, welfare services, victim support, or newly created civilian defence offices. They would provide daily-life assistance, emotional stabilisation, logistical support, communication management, and protection against isolation.
If hostile groups use women, gendered pressure, social embarrassment, or intimate social manipulation as part of their method of attack, then a lawful countermeasure must not abandon the affected individual to isolation. A structured support team, including adult women trained and authorised under law, may become a significant first-stage defensive response.
This would allow the state or international civilian defence structure to prevent the decline of a strategically important civilian contributor, while also creating a lawful model for protecting individuals who have produced serious public-interest information without institutional backing.
In summary, I request consideration of the following:
Recognition of an International Civilian Defence framework.
Creation of a registered status for a Private Individual Think Tank.
Allocation of stipend, salary, grant, or equivalent financial support.
Formal recognition, honour, or reward for major civilian strategic contributions.
Assignment of administrative, medical, welfare, and protection personnel.
Establishment of a gender-sensitive support structure using properly vetted adult female staff where appropriate.
Long-term institutional protection so that individuals who produce major public-interest information are not treated as disposable sources.
This matter concerns not only my personal situation, but also the future treatment of civilians who independently identify, analyse, and respond to strategic risks that existing institutions have failed to address.
ーー
Long version.
ーー
Proposal for the Establishment of an International Civilian Defence Framework and the Formal Recognition of Private Individual Think Tanks
A Request for Institutional Recognition, Protection, Support, and Remuneration for Civilian Strategic Work Conducted Without Organisational Backing
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to present a structured proposal concerning the legal and institutional recognition of a new category of civilian contribution: the Private Individual Think Tank operating within a broader framework of International Civilian Defence.
The materials I have written, posted, and submitted over many years are not casual opinions, personal grievances, or isolated reactions. They are the result of more than twenty-five years of observation, experience, information-gathering, retrospective analysis, and legal-structural thinking.
Around the year 2000, I became aware, through information posted on message boards and other public online spaces, that certain forms of repeated harassment, personal insult, social interference, and organised pressure were not simply urban legends. The enclosure and manipulation of children, the use of social environments to isolate individuals, and the repetition of psychologically aggressive behaviour appeared to correspond to real patterns. Looking back over my own life, I began to recognise that certain events, pressures, and social abnormalities could be understood as part of a wider structure rather than as disconnected personal misfortunes.
Over time, I attempted to convert these experiences into information. I then attempted to convert that information into a legal and institutional framework. The purpose has been to identify how states and international institutions might respond to organised sect-like structures, social interference, institutional corruption, and hostile patterns that ordinary criminal justice systems may not be able to handle effectively on their own.
However, it is essential to state the following point clearly.
I have not had institutional backing.
I have not had financial support.
I have not had a research team.
I have not had a political organisation behind me.
I have not had a foundation, university, think tank, intelligence office, defence institution, or private sponsor supporting this work.
Within my own personal communications and community, there has been no organised system of funding, protection, personnel, or administrative assistance. I have been producing information, analysis, legal concepts, and strategic proposals as an isolated private individual.
In practical terms, I am simply a man living on a Basic Disability Pension. I have been diagnosed as unable to work. I have received a Grade 1 psychiatric disability diagnosis. Since childhood, I have suffered from severe fatigue, post-exertional malaise, depressive symptoms, and a continuing sense of anxiety about the future. I have nevertheless continued to analyse and document these issues because the situation appeared too serious to ignore.
My condition does not mean that I have lost all selfhood, identity, or capacity for judgement. However, I do experience severe physical and mental exhaustion after exertion. I also experience depressive pressure, long-term anxiety, and, at times, experiences close to auditory hallucinations, such as intensely negative internal voices, intrusive thoughts, or hostile impressions arising within the mind. These symptoms are part of the medical and social reality in which this work has been carried out.
This is why the issue cannot be treated merely as a matter of intellectual recognition. It is also a matter of survival, protection, and human rights.
If a private individual, without institutional support, is placed in a position where he effectively compensates for the inaction, insufficiency, or failure of national and international institutions, then the continued use of his information without recognition, protection, or material support may become a serious human-rights concern.
Originally, I did not begin this work in order to obtain income. I did not begin it as a business. I did not begin it as a professional research project. However, the scale of responsibility has become far too large to continue without remuneration, protection, and institutional status.
If a civilian independently produces strategic information relevant to national security, international security, anti-sect legislation, institutional corruption, election integrity, hostile influence, organised harassment, and the prevention of future risks, then that civilian should not be treated as a disposable source of information.
A legal category is therefore required.
I propose the creation of a framework called:
International Civilian Defence
Within that framework, I propose a registered category called:
Private Individual Think Tank
This would refer to an individual civilian who, without belonging to an existing research institution, defence office, intelligence organisation, or university, has nevertheless produced substantial information, analysis, legal concepts, and policy proposals relevant to national and international security.
Such a person would not be a mere commentator.
Such a person would not be a casual activist.
Such a person would not be merely a petitioner.
Such a person would be a civilian strategic contributor whose work has produced public value beyond ordinary private expression.
The purpose of this category would be to ensure that individuals who generate serious strategic insight are not abandoned, exploited, ignored, or consumed by the institutions that benefit from their work.
The state and international institutions already recognise many forms of public service. Soldiers, civil servants, researchers, intelligence officers, emergency workers, diplomats, and public officials may all receive salaries, pensions, honours, awards, protection, or institutional support. However, a private individual who identifies a major structural problem before institutions respond to it may be left with no status at all.
This gap must be addressed.
If an individual has contributed to identifying or partially resolving problems that the state and international system were unable to solve by themselves, then it appears legally and institutionally possible to recognise that contribution as a serious public achievement.
The relevant principle may be stated as follows:
Where a private civilian has independently identified, analysed, and contributed to the resolution of a national or international problem that existing institutions failed to address adequately, that civilian may be recognised as having made a major strategic public contribution.
Such recognition could include:
Formal legal status.
Registration as a Private Individual Think Tank.
A stipend, salary, grant, or special allowance.
Administrative support.
Medical and psychological support.
Security and protection support.
Communication and documentation assistance.
Long-term institutional placement.
A public honour, award, or compensatory recognition.
A dedicated office or department to handle similar cases in the future.
This is not a request for charity.
It is a request for the recognition of civilian strategic labour already performed under exceptional pressure.
In my own case, I have spent approximately seven years bringing these concepts into a form that can be stated as legal and strategic proposals. Across that period, I have attempted to address issues that appear to involve anti-sect legislation, hostile social structures, institutional corruption, media pressure, election-related concerns, international security, and the protection of future society from risks that are otherwise ignored.
I have also begun reporting these concerns to foreign political figures. Because the material is complex and unusual, it is possible that foreign legislators and their support teams may require time to understand the full structure. I therefore respectfully request that they consider not only the information itself, but also the institutional status and protection of the person who has produced it.
The proposal is not merely that my information be read.
The proposal is that a new legal and administrative category be created.
A possible structure would be as follows:
International Civilian Defence
→ a broad framework for civilian contributions to national and international security.
Private Individual Think Tank
→ a registered civilian individual operating within that framework.
Civilian Strategic Contributor
→ a person who has produced substantial information, legal concepts, or strategic proposals without institutional support.
Support and Protection Unit
→ a small assigned team responsible for welfare, administration, communication, documentation, and protection.
If such a framework were connected to an international organisation, including NATO or a NATO-related civilian defence mechanism, then the question of national funding would arise. If a Japanese citizen were recognised under such a framework, it appears possible that Japan’s defence budget, foreign affairs budget, welfare budget, or another appropriate public budget could be used to provide support.
In that case, I could be recognised not merely as a pension recipient or private petitioner, but as a civilian strategic contributor whose work has produced public value and international relevance.
I also request consideration of an honour, award, or compensatory grant. In my view, I have contributed to the easing of an extremely severe political and social situation by repeatedly explaining structural concerns to political figures, broadcasters, and relevant public actors. Japanese politicians appeared to have been under heavy media pressure, and the wider situation appeared severely dysfunctional. If my civilian analysis contributed to restoring balance or reducing pressure, then that contribution should be assessed as a matter of public interest.
This may be described as:
A major civilian contribution to the identification and partial correction of a strategic institutional failure.
Such a contribution should not disappear into silence.
There is also a broader future concern. If states continue to ignore civilians who independently discover major risks, then future risks will remain undetected or unaddressed until they become crises. A proper civilian defence structure would allow governments to receive, evaluate, protect, and support exceptional civilian contributors before their information is lost.
This would also prevent the abuse of such individuals. Without formal status, a civilian may be used as an unpaid source. His ideas may be absorbed. His proposals may be copied. His information may be used indirectly. Yet he may receive no protection, no income, no recognition, and no stable place in society.
That outcome would be unacceptable.
A society that benefits from a civilian’s strategic labour must also consider the civilian’s survival.
In my own case, the difficulty is intensified by disability. When post-exertional malaise is severe, daily life itself becomes difficult. Even if income were available, ordinary functioning would still require assistance. Therefore, the recognition of a Private Individual Think Tank must not be symbolic only. It must include practical support.
A proper support structure should include:
assistance with daily administration;
assistance with communication;
assistance with document preparation;
assistance with scheduling and health management;
welfare-based support;
psychological stabilisation;
protection from isolation;
assistance in dealing with public institutions;
assistance in preserving and organising records;
support in maintaining a sustainable living environment.
Without these supports, the state would be recognising the value of the work while leaving the person who created it to collapse. That would defeat the purpose of the framework.
There is also a gender-related issue that must be addressed carefully and lawfully.
If hostile structures use women, gendered pressure, social embarrassment, intimate manipulation, romantic provocation, or socially engineered isolation as part of their method of attack, then the defensive structure must also be capable of responding to that method. An isolated male civilian who has been placed under severe pressure should not be left alone if gendered manipulation has been part of the hostile pattern.
For this reason, I propose that properly vetted adult female support officers, welfare assistants, liaison personnel, protection staff, or civilian defence assistants may be assigned where appropriate.
Their role would be lawful, professional, protective, administrative, and welfare-based.
Their role would not be private, exploitative, sexual, or irregular.
Their role would be to stabilise the environment, reduce isolation, assist daily life, support communication, and help protect the civilian contributor from further psychological or social deterioration.
Such personnel could include adult women with backgrounds in:
the military;
defence administration;
police-adjacent institutions;
welfare services;
victim support;
medical support;
social work;
civilian defence offices;
administrative support;
international liaison work.
The assignment of adult female personnel may be especially relevant where the hostile method itself involves the instrumentalisation of women or gendered social pressure. In such cases, a lawful, professional, and protective female support presence may become a significant first-stage countermeasure.
This should be understood as part of a broader gender-sensitive protective model.
If women are used as tools of pressure by hostile groups, the lawful response should not be to isolate the affected individual further. The lawful response should be to provide properly trained, properly authorised, adult support personnel who can restore ordinary human contact, stabilise daily life, and prevent the hostile method from succeeding.
This is not an exceptional privilege.
It is a practical protective measure.
In the context of International Civilian Defence, such support personnel would not be personal companions in a private sense. They would be staff members attached to a recognised civilian defence role. They would operate under rules, supervision, documentation, and legal responsibility.
The purpose would be:
To protect the civilian contributor.
To preserve the continuity of important strategic work.
To prevent psychological collapse.
To prevent hostile isolation.
To create a lawful countermeasure against gender-based manipulation.
To integrate welfare, defence, and civilian intelligence support into one protective framework.
The same principle could apply to male staff, mixed staff, medical staff, and administrative staff. The key point is that the support structure must be responsive to the actual methods of pressure used against the individual.
If the hostile method uses isolation, the response must include human support.
If the hostile method uses administrative overload, the response must include administrative support.
If the hostile method uses psychological exhaustion, the response must include medical and welfare support.
If the hostile method uses gendered manipulation, the response must include lawful gender-sensitive protection.
This is the practical meaning of International Civilian Defence.
It is not enough for the state to say that a civilian’s information is useful.
It must also ensure that the civilian remains alive, stable, protected, and able to continue contributing.
I therefore request the establishment of a dedicated department or office for this purpose. This department could be placed under a defence ministry, foreign affairs ministry, civilian protection authority, intelligence review body, or international civilian defence mechanism. Its role would be to evaluate and support civilians who have produced serious strategic information outside ordinary institutions.
The department should have the authority to:
receive civilian strategic submissions;
evaluate long-term civilian research;
protect individuals who face retaliation or social pressure;
provide emergency stipends or grants;
assign administrative assistants;
assign welfare and medical support;
coordinate with defence and foreign affairs authorities;
create records of contribution;
recommend honours or awards;
register individuals as Private Individual Think Tanks;
preserve information for future legal and historical review.
This framework would also benefit governments. Many emerging risks are first noticed by individuals before institutions fully recognise them. A civilian who notices a pattern early may be dismissed as unusual, excessive, or difficult to classify. Yet, in hindsight, such individuals may have identified precisely the problem that institutions failed to see.
An International Civilian Defence framework would allow governments to avoid losing such information.
It would also prevent the moral failure of using a civilian’s work while refusing to recognise the civilian himself.
In my case, the matter is urgent because I have already spent years producing and submitting information under severe personal strain. I have reached a point where continuing without support is not realistic. The creation of information alone does not secure food, housing, health, communication, or social survival.
If my work has public value, then the person who created it must not be abandoned.
I therefore respectfully request consideration of the following institutional measures:
1. Recognition of International Civilian Defence
A broad legal and administrative framework should be created to recognise civilian contributions to national and international security.
2. Creation of the Private Individual Think Tank status
A registered category should be established for individuals who produce serious strategic analysis, legal frameworks, or policy concepts without institutional backing.
3. Financial support
Such individuals should be eligible for a stipend, salary, grant, special allowance, or equivalent form of remuneration.
4. Medical and welfare support
Where the individual has a disability or severe health condition, support must include daily-life assistance, medical coordination, and psychological stabilisation.
5. Administrative and communication support
A small team should assist with documentation, correspondence, translation, record preservation, and communication with public authorities.
6. Protection from isolation and retaliation
Where the individual faces organised social pressure, harassment, or hostile manipulation, protective measures should be available.
7. Gender-sensitive support personnel
Where gendered pressure or the instrumentalisation of women is part of the hostile method, properly vetted adult female staff may be assigned as lawful support officers, welfare assistants, liaison personnel, or protection staff.
8. Formal honour or recognition
Where a civilian has contributed to the identification or partial resolution of a major institutional failure, an honour, award, or compensatory grant should be considered.
9. Long-term institutional placement
The individual should not be treated as a temporary source. A continuing status should be available where the work remains relevant to future risks.
10. International coordination
Where the issues concern multiple countries, allied governments, NATO-related institutions, or international civilian defence structures should be able to review and support the framework.
This proposal is not limited to my personal case. My case may be the first clear example, but the framework should exist for future cases as well. In an age of information warfare, institutional corruption, hostile influence, sect-like structures, psychological pressure, and social manipulation, private civilians may sometimes detect patterns before official bodies do.
The state should not ignore them.
The state should not exploit them.
The state should not leave them unsupported.
The state should create a lawful category through which their contribution can be reviewed, protected, and recognised.
I therefore request that foreign legislators, government officials, defence-related personnel, and their support teams consider this proposal as a serious matter of public policy.
The central claim is simple:
A civilian who independently produces strategic information of national or international value should be capable of receiving legal status, protection, financial support, and formal recognition.
If that civilian has done so while disabled, isolated, and without institutional backing, the need for protection is even greater.
The materials I have produced should therefore be reviewed not merely as submissions, but as the work of a potential Private Individual Think Tank within an International Civilian Defence framework.
The appropriate response is not only to read the information.
The appropriate response is to create the institutional place in which such work can be lawfully recognised, supported, and continued.
This is not a request for charity.
It is a request for institutional recognition of civilian strategic labour already performed under exceptional pressure.
It is also a request that future civilian contributors not be left in the same unsupported condition.
If a state or international alliance benefits from civilian defence work, then that work must be given a lawful status, a protective framework, and a means of survival.
That is the purpose of this proposal.
ーーー
Additional Key Points on Personal Status, Public Responsibility, and Institutional Recognition
In light of my personal circumstances, my legal and medical position, and the fact that this work was carried out without institutional, financial, or organisational backing, the matter should not be treated merely as the submission of information by an ordinary private individual.
I have produced this material while living under severe physical, psychological, and social limitations, including disability, chronic fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and the absence of any formal support structure. Therefore, the question is not only whether the information itself has value, but whether the person who produced it should be recognised, protected, and supported by an appropriate institutional framework.
The information has already been produced. What is now required is the institutional courage to recognise the person who produced it.
ーーー
Additional Note Regarding the Absence of Review of the Translated Text
Please note that I have not reconsidered or reviewed any of the translated content posted today.
I have not checked the translated text at all. The materials written so far have already been produced under conditions that exceeded my psychological and physical limits, and I no longer have any remaining capacity to verify, reconsider, or refine the translated content.
I believe that these materials were created by forcibly amplifying my concentration under a state of stimulation caused by caffeine, antidepressant medication, and tranquillisers — more precisely, Depromel and Selcin. At this point, I feel so exhausted that I can no longer maintain even that state of stimulation.
Therefore, please understand that the present submission is being made without any review or confirmation of the translated content.
I have not committed any sexual offenses in the past. Rather, please understand that these individuals were always around me, sometimes as close as 5-6 meters away, even when I was in rehabilitation in a nearby park in my late twenties, and during my adolescence, up until they turned 15. They were taller than boys of the same age; in Japan, a woman of 160cm is considered tall, and they were around that height and weight by the age of 15. Please understand that these are provocative individuals, part of external operatives, and that this is an attack on a city, national, and international scale. Please understand that they are to masimum, actors designed to induce sexual offenses.
If a conversation were to occur, a strategic phase would be employed to subtly and intentionally advance the relationship towards sexual relations, and a deliberate display of sexual tolerance would be repeated. Please understand that even if a conversation develops into friendship, and that are invited to a such as car or similar location, this can quickly escalate into a sexual relationship in intention and military sterategy,also based on malicious intent. Even if it doesn't go that far, gestures such as intentionally showing what's under them skirt are commonplace. I am suffering from a severe sexless relationship, and if I were to engage in a reration to secret sexual relationship, it would simply made uo to be a sexual crime, an external operative designed to destroy social order, and such entities lurk in every region.
ーーー
Additional Key Points Regarding Modding Culture, Sexual Allegations, and My Personal Position
It should also be understood that, in the culture surrounding Grand Theft Auto modification, the introduction of mods, modifications, or additional scripts is often incomplete, unstable, or non-functional. In many cases, such scripts must also be adapted to minor platform changes, version changes, or changes in the game environment.
There is a specific culture in which users must search through large archives in order to find the correct script loader or supporting software from the same period as the script itself. This technical and cultural background should also be recognised as part of the context of my writing.
I must also state clearly that I have not committed any sexual offence in the past.
In my late twenties, while I was undergoing rehabilitation in a neighbourhood park, I repeatedly observed a small number of girls who appeared physically mature for their age and who were repeatedly present in the same area. Until approximately the age of fifteen, they appeared almost every day in the same park, often in highly provocative or socially unusual circumstances. From my perspective, this formed part of a patterned attack carried out at an urban, national, or possibly international scale.
My understanding is that these individuals may have been placed there as external operatives in order to induce a sexual offence or create a situation that could later be used against me. Even where there was no conversation at all, and only eye contact occurred, the repeated daily presence of adolescent girls in the same park created an abnormal and highly pressured environment.
At the time, their height and build appeared to be within the average range of Japanese women, approximately 150 to 160 centimetres. However, when I later saw individuals who may have been the same persons after they had become adults, they appeared to have grown into unusually tall women by Japanese standards, possibly over 170 centimetres.
Around 2015, I believe I saw one of those individuals again when she appeared to be around twenty years old, in the parking area of a convenience store. On that occasion, she made a gesture with her lips that I interpreted as meaning something like “later” or “see you later.” Since she appeared to be an adult at that time, I do not know what the legal or personal meaning of that situation would have been.
Nevertheless, I ask that the broader pattern be understood. The concern is that such situations may have been constructed to lead a man into sexual contact, pregnancy, forced marriage, false responsibility, or other forms of social entrapment.
I also know several people among my acquaintances who had children within a relatively short period of time and then married as a result. From a DNA perspective, it is at least possible in such cases that the presumed father may not necessarily be the biological father.
There are also couples who, even during a period of high reproductive activity, engaged in frequent unprotected sexual relations over several years and still conceived only a limited number of times. This suggests that pregnancy cannot be treated as a simple or automatic result, and that assumptions about paternity, responsibility, and social pressure must be handled carefully.
These points are not raised to deny responsibility in ordinary cases. They are raised to explain that, where patterned social placement, sexual provocation, reproductive pressure, and possible entrapment are involved, the matter must be examined with far greater caution.
ー
Couples who had unprotected sex multiple times a day during high school (the period when the human body is most actively involved in fertilization) experienced only four pregnancies over a three-year period.
援交 陸上部 ユウキ
h ttps://ikioi.blog.jp/archives/1045969928.html
関西援交
千葉援交
If you search using these terms and set the area to Japan, you will find many videos that appear to be domestic, showing girls who seem to be 15 or 16 years old engaging in sexual acts with multiple men without any hesitation. Please be careful when opening the URL links.
ーーーーーー
Please note the following: The images are uploaded as is. Because the search result URL cannot be obtained on tablet devices, the images are uploaded directly.
---
The girl on the right, around 10 years old, was seen having sex with a much older man without any hesitation in what is called a motel in America (a type of establishment known as a love hotel in Japan). This is a portion of that video.
Around 2007, when the P2P software LimeWire,existed and was functioning, there were many videos of teenage girls, including 13-year-olds and 10-year-olds, engaging in sexual acts with middle-aged men, some of whom claimed to be their fathers.
ーーー
The following is a complete English translation of the Japanese sections above. However, due to severe fatigue, the highly stressful nature of the task, and personality traits similar to ADHD that make self-control difficult at times, I can become somewhat burned out and unable to maintain enough energy to review the overall structure or correct the translation in detail. Therefore, please make any necessary corrections independently if you find any unnatural wording or phrasing.
In any case, after examining and forecasting the overall picture, I have a high degree of confidence that I am able to clearly present both the existence of the situation and the methods of countermeasure in a way that anyone can understand.
Request for the Establishment of an International Civilian Defence Framework and a Registered Private Individual Think Tank Status
The material posted here is based on more than twenty-five years of practical information-gathering and personal experience. Through repeated patterns of personal harassment and the appearance of individuals seemingly acting under AI-driven or organised instructions, I came to recognise that what had once appeared to be mere urban legend was, in fact, connected to real phenomena, including the systematic grooming or containment of children and young people.
Since around the year 2000, information found on online message boards led me to understand that these matters were not simply rumours or myths. By looking back over my own life and converting the situations I experienced into structured information, I have attempted to formulate them into a legal and institutional framework capable of response.
However, in my personal communications and community life, I have never had any organisation, community, financial structure, or institutional support backing this work.
Since childhood, I became aware of symptoms resembling post-exertional malaise and severe fatigue, and I continued to live with a long-standing sense of anxiety about the future of my life. In reality, I am merely a man who has reached this age while living only on the Basic Disability Pension, with support from my father.
For that reason, I ask that the legal status of a “private individual think tank engaged in international activity” be formally considered, along with the initial assignment of personnel and the allocation of an allowance or support structure for such a role.
There is room for the existence of what may be called “international civilian defence.” Within that broader framework, there should also be a recognised category of an “international private individual think tank,” and a corresponding system of compensation, protection, and institutional support.
Please understand that such a legal framework is necessary.
In addition, unless new personnel assignments and placements are considered in parallel, in order to establish a comprehensive legal framework through which I can belong to a new community or institutional structure, I may end up producing information without receiving any benefit whatsoever. In that case, I would effectively become disposable, and this may itself amount to an infringement of human rights.
Although I did not originally begin this work for profit, I have fallen into a situation in which I am bearing a major responsibility by compensating for international governmental inaction. Please understand that continuing such work without compensation is, from the outset, entirely impossible.
Furthermore, if I were to be registered with an international organisation, such as NATO, as a private individual think tank, then as a Japanese national I could reasonably become someone who receives practical remuneration from Japan’s defence budget, given the level of information I have provided and collected.
Japanese politicians had been subjected to sustained attacks from television and other media, and I explained this situation to all broadcasting stations. As a result, the situation appeared to ease. Considering this recovery from what had been a desperate situation, I would also like to request recognition in the form of an “award” or official honour.
Internationally, if NATO were hypothetically to have jurisdiction over such a matter, it should be capable of becoming an agenda item concerning shared international security. It therefore appears possible to establish a common legal framework among multiple countries.
In short, this is the launch of international civilian defence.
It is an agenda concerning the establishment and activity of a broad civilian defence organisation.
In my case, it appears legally possible to grant recognition for “a major achievement,” namely that I addressed and helped resolve problems which a government, acting alone, had been unable to resolve in the context of national and international affairs.
Up to this point, this appears to be within the realm of what is possible. I have also suddenly reported these matters to foreign politicians, and it may still be difficult for each political team to organise and fully digest the information. Even for me, this is a new concept that I have barely managed to produce after spending roughly the last seven years on it. I do not wish to spend any more time on this. My father is also elderly. I would therefore like to request support from foreign politicians and their backup teams if possible.
This is information provided for the purpose of requesting the creation of a legal framework for myself as a private individual think tank within the broader framework of international civilian defence.
The purpose is to avoid leaving future risks unattended. I would like to request the establishment of a department that not only deals continuously with issues relating to anti-sect law, but also recognises the position and continuing honour of a private individual think tank that has produced major information and legal-framework proposals.
In other words, this is a proposal to treat “international civilian defence” as a broad category within an international legal framework, and to establish a department within it responsible for handling “private individual think tanks.” This would include management, allowances, awards, and formal requests for recognition.
Within this context, I receive the Basic Disability Pension. I have been diagnosed as unable to work and have received a Grade 1 mental disability diagnosis. That corresponds to my actual condition. Although I have not completely lost my self or ego, I experience strong symptoms resembling post-exertional malaise, depression, and lifelong anxiety. At times, I may hear highly negative inner voices, thoughts, or mental impressions that are close to auditory hallucinations. This is the condition on which my diagnosis is based.
When the underlying post-exertional malaise is strong, even if I had income, it would still be extremely difficult to maintain ordinary daily life.
First, international civilian defence should be defined. Within it, a legal framework for a private individual think tank appears possible. Yet during what I regard as a wartime situation, I am one civilian carrying out one of the strongest forms of resistance.
Legally, it may be difficult to classify such a person. However, if one recognises the existence of long-term, group-based attacks mediated through women and social manipulation, and if an international military or security framework were to respond institutionally, then it may become necessary to assign personal support staff, caretakers, or security-related aides to such a private individual think tank.
This is because the countermeasure involved would be of a serious and high-intensity nature.
In my specific case, support for my symptoms, together with legal protection that prevents my role as a counteracting presence from declining, could make an initial and significant response possible. This could involve legally protected assistance by relatively young adult women belonging to military or equivalent organisations, or by individuals who have been removed from sect control and rehabilitated under a newly created legal framework. Such a structure could neutralise what has been carried out through long-term strategy.
If a broad attack method using girls or young women exists, and if military or military-equivalent organisations remove minors from harmful social structures, then the matter may no longer be handled solely through ordinary judicial procedures. Instead, if such individuals are placed under the discretion of the state, they could be managed within a protective and corrective framework.
Under a military-equivalent organisation, it may be possible to create legally supervised forms of association, support, and protection. This could allow for a large-scale countermeasure.
In this context, the adult women belonging to relatively young military or military-equivalent organisations would likely receive several times the ordinary salary, perhaps five or six times the usual amount.
The likely candidates would be individuals prepared not to pursue an ordinary married life in the future, or those who intend to keep their past confidential like ordinary women and marry by around the age of thirty, with the understanding that the risk and burden would be reflected in salary. Their appearance would not need to be that of magazine models, but rather ordinary women with broadly favourable appearances from a male perspective. Another possible category would be women with divorce experience who do not intend to remarry.
When viewed simply as anti-sect law, this may appear easier to handle.
Politically, however, I understand that under current political methods it is extremely difficult to devise a response to what resembles an ancient tactic: the covert subordination or use of women within society as a method of modern conflict.
First, individuals must be separated from sect structures. Next, those separated from ordinary social systems may, at a later stage, be handled not under ordinary national law alone, but under state discretion within a special framework. At that stage, a large-scale countermeasure against the attacking entity becomes possible. This may also be a method that can be implemented simultaneously across broad areas of the world.
The reason I say this is that attacks of this level may exist.
There is a possibility that a former United States Marine was killed through the actions of a young girl.
I cannot confirm the investigative status myself. However, based on my experience of contributing to the improvement of deteriorating domestic conditions, I am publishing this information as a firm assessment.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/k84Ad40TQgA
“9 year old girl accidentally kills shooting instructor with Uzi”
12,000 views
9 years ago
I do not regard this as an accident. I consider it intentional. When looking at the strategic behaviour that children have previously been able to carry out, I believe that at this age it is sufficiently possible for such an act to be intentional. There can be a condition in which a child obeys instructions absolutely.
A robbery incident that occurred in central Tokyo may also have been instructed by AI. In particular, the perpetrators committed a serious crime without any clear place to go and were immediately arrested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lrmGxgMPZw
I believe that AI had analysed information and used even random game content in order to issue simple instructions.
https://youtu.be/EVB62SKaxGo?t=200
This location is highly consistent with what AI identifies as “strong similarity.”
I focused on the fact that the outcome of this incident involved a person calmly walking along a fifth-floor balcony railing in Japan. From that, I inferred that the perpetrator was likely a repeat offender targeting higher floors. I sent this inference to Sanae Takaichi’s contact form. During the Ishiba Cabinet, an increase in Self-Defense Force personnel was carried out.
I warned that in midsummer, people in Japan often sleep without special caution, leaving only screen doors closed. Since I myself had slept in such a condition even on the second floor, I warned that intruders could enter and steal small amounts of money. If the amount were around 5,000 or 10,000 yen, it might not be treated as a criminal case and could instead be dismissed as a mistaken memory.
Because the perpetrators were repeat offenders, I believe bots found such individuals and caused them to commit robberies. Even before the clearest video-recorded case, similar robberies appear to have occurred. I believe this was because AI had instructed them.
Citizen Lab
When one searches Citizen Lab through Google AI, it is described as a Canadian cybersecurity research institution. Citizen Lab has analysed PenLink / Cobwebs and WebLoc, identifying mechanisms by which advertising-derived location data can be used to monitor many devices around the world.
I believe that many derivative forms of such software exist. In Israel, such software may have been built to counter conspiracy theories. However, I suspect that it may mistakenly have been sold to front companies of hybrid mafia-like organisations, including the socialist remnants and descendants of Siberian detainees that I have been pointing out.
For Israeli people, Jewish Europeans, and Jewish Americans, conspiracy theories concerning the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 appear to have been regarded as extremely grave and unforgivable acts of information dissemination. For that reason, an ideology of independently identifying and retaliating against perceived racists may have been strongly prioritised.
At least according to an article introduced by Eron Mask, such a tendency was described.
However, at that time, it was not possible to determine whether the article had been generated by bots.
As a private individual, I can make comprehensive forecasts. However, it is difficult to obtain evidence concerning individual details, or to obtain legally admissible proof. Therefore, please understand that my work specialises in grasping, understanding, and forecasting the overall structure; predicting unknown hostile structures; and constructing and devising countermeasures.
As a whole, I regard this as disruption, sabotage, and combat activity. The local sects are merely tools. I personally conclude that the objective is the destruction of areas considered part of the West. The aim is to make it difficult to understand what is happening, to turn government personnel into sect members, and effectively to overthrow states and destroy countries regarded as Western.
Although attacks are repeated from a concealed position, these groups are not conventional organisations that openly engage in combat. If superiority can be maintained on this point, I believe the combat activity can be suppressed.
Due to severe stress, I continue to play Grand Theft Auto as usual and upload videos. Even during the past year, my life has appeared to be in jeopardy several times through methods that clearly resemble covert operations. I have no way of knowing when I may be killed by someone acting according to instructions from AI or from another person.
Next, there was a girl who appeared in a Japanese television drama around 2010. She appeared physically larger and more mature than her age.
The video mentioned above appeared through an algorithm despite the existence of a vast amount of linked image and video information associated with “pink hot pants.” If it is true that jeans and clothing aimed at girls were intentionally sewn and mass-exported from countries such as China, thereby producing large numbers of children who looked like miniature versions of adult women, then attention can be directed to the category of pink hot pants aimed at girls around the age of ten.
Female announcers sometimes introduce news with wording that implies, “men are distracted by the appearance of very young women.” However, the reality is much more difficult for current political methods to understand.
I do not regard this as mere synchronicity. For the purpose of document organisation, I regard it as planned simultaneity and long-term attack coordination.
I profile the situation as follows: men may have been surrounded or conditioned by girls who directed deliberate affectionate attention toward them, as I have described repeatedly. Eventually, such men may have begun searching online for similar girls, especially in Asia, and as a result may have been targeted.
Once a person begins viewing such material online, and once such attention is repeatedly directed at him, colours and shapes that evoke adrenaline linked to romance and sexuality may gradually become layered into memory. This can occur even when adult women are being imitated through clothing. In other words, once repeated, it can become an instinctive memory. Upon seeing similar images again, the person may feel romantic or sexual attraction. This is a discussion of an attack method capable of producing multiple effects.
The man in question clearly appeared to have a sense of excitement.
The victim’s name was Charles Vacca. The name “Charles” can imply Prince Charles. “Vacca,” when read in Japanese-like sound association, may resemble “baka,” meaning fool, although the spelling is not BAKA. I believe that cult-like groups may use such implications to see whether intelligence agencies in various countries will notice and investigate them.
The Columbine shooting incident can immediately be profiled through strings such as Columbine, Columbia, Columbus, Cuba, and cocaine. This may suggest the former Soviet sphere, yet it does not appear to have received such attention.
Once a shooting incident occurs, similar patterns begin to emerge across the United States.
If one assumes that the descendants of non-returned Siberian detainees received advanced intelligence activity and training, then whether they are German, Japanese, or American, an intentional attack on the name “Charles” would be one of the most understandable profiling elements. Alternatively, this could apply to any actor from the socialist sphere. Those who might wish to attack “Charles” could include Americans, British people who believe their own country betrayed them, Germans, or Japanese groups. These are highly understandable categories.
Around 2005, when I searched using what resembled a random 256-bit password string, I found what appeared to be a blog from that time that said, “I will remain in the Soviet Union.”
I wondered whether people in the former socialist sphere still referred to their country as the Soviet Union. However, the fact that such a string resembling a 256-bit password produced a hit suggests that it was very close to an element appearing in that site’s URL or search structure. It was likely a server connected to me, and therefore easy to hit in search. At that time, it was likely a basic server used as a stepping-stone for hacking across servers.
When considered in this sequence, and when one thinks about pink hot pants and the behavioural patterns of girls around the situation, if a man named Charles died, then, considering the string “Columbine,” it is more natural to regard it as deliberate implication.
If deliberate implication is assumed, then the possibility of a killing carried out through a young girl must be considered.
If this were true, it would be understood as an extremely serious situation.
At the age of nine, a child may easily give the impression of innocence and helplessness. However, when someone goes specifically to a shooting range, is it really likely that such negligence would occur? It seems more ordinary to think that the probability is extremely low.
This is the kind of thing that might be expected from a five- or six-year-old. By the age of nine, it seems unlikely that a child would mistakenly continue pulling a trigger under recoil to such an extent that someone would be killed, if the child had been instructed properly. It is reasonable to think that a nine-year-old could understand the need to hold the gun firmly. The trigger may have been pulled, and it appears from the situation that the grip was still being held.
The gun did not appear simply to fly away from the recoil and strike the head. Rather, the situation looks very much as if the recoil pivoted around the arms, or was made to pivot.
If the trigger had been pulled by mistake, one might expect the gun itself to fly away. In that case, a hit to the head would seem unlikely and difficult to achieve. However, if intentional recoil could be produced, then after training, a hit to the head would be possible. If the gun had come out of the girl’s grip, then it would be highly unnatural for the girl herself not to have been seriously injured or killed.
The content suggests that the trigger was pulled, but the gun continued to be held through the recoil.
I have never operated an Uzi, so I cannot know this directly.
However, if parents go to a place where such weapons are handled and allow a nine-year-old girl to hold an automatic firearm, it would be highly unnatural for them not to have explained the matter beforehand.
With a young girl in pink hot pants, public opinion would likely rush toward the impression that a pathetic adult man was speaking with an innocent girl and was then accidentally killed. It may also have implicitly become that kind of topic. That would have been the purpose. It could then be predicted that masculinity in America would decline further.
Female anchors on CNN and other outlets appeared to speak in an upbeat and almost cheerful tone, as if implying that a former Marine with roughly ten years of experience in Afghanistan had been distracted by a nine-year-old girl’s pink hot pants, that feminism and sexualised fashion had reached even very young girls, and that a large man somehow became excited by a recent young girl wearing pink shorts and was killed by an accidental discharge.
However, the more one studies the reality of cult groups, the more one realises that it is not such a simple story. I also remember that by around the age of ten, children are not necessarily as innocent as adults assume.
At the age of four or five, a cult group or sect can already use a child for sufficient operational activity. By the age of ten, a child can act late at night while pretending to be a ghost.
In 1996, while riding through an alley with friends, I saw a boy who looked about five or six years old. He was wearing a hood in the middle of winter and riding a red tricycle at around midnight. His face could not be seen because it was in shadow. As if staged, he passed directly beside several sixteen-year-old boys on motorcycles without showing fear.
For about ten seconds, I felt as if my back had frozen, wondering whether I had seen a real ghost. The friend riding at the front was trying to see the boy’s face. One of the boys riding in the middle adopted a low-profile attitude and said something like, “You’re trying to trick me again,” which was unlike his usual behaviour. He had not previously shown such an attitude of self-minimisation.
The area had karaoke pubs in the Japanese sense — pubs with karaoke — and seemed to include rough households. I therefore concluded that the child was probably from such a household. My friend, who did not seem to be part of any sect and who had tried to see the child’s face, did not seem concerned at all.
Perhaps he knew the character of the area. Or perhaps he may have been part of a sect. I do not know. He had a positive personality and would generally not worry about such events or dwell on them. In other words, my friend, who I believe was not part of a sect and who did not think deeply about it, was riding two motorcycles ahead of me. He saw the very young child, who looked about five or six, riding a tricycle late at night like a ghost. I also saw this from behind. He later said he had seen it, but even afterwards he only said something like, “I wonder what that was,” and did not pay much attention.
The problem is that there exists a person who, without fear, can pass through a dark alley alone at midnight, directly beside three motorcycles travelling at around 60 kilometres per hour, at a distance of less than one metre. It seemed almost exactly beside us, perhaps around fifty centimetres away. From the front, perhaps the child did not appear suddenly, and perhaps the front rider could confirm that it was simply a child from the karaoke pub house or somewhere nearby, and therefore did not worry.
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrIkarPCb6o
This is a video in which the person claims that many cases are like that. When considering mobilisation, however, my investigation includes things that happened around me after 2020.
For example, in a bright entertainment district of Tokyo, a person dressed almost identically to my nephew appeared in the middle of an alley in a strange manner, resembling what might be called a ghostly person. The resemblance was so strong that, for a moment, I mistook him for my nephew.
He stood completely still in the middle of the alley without moving a single step.
In my experience, children participate in such activities. Therefore, the facts become clear only when each individual person is investigated one by one.
These matters also produce suspicion and paranoia, so caution is needed when viewing such material. This kind of suspicion appears to have occurred strongly in a young Australian woman who was then a high school student, and it has also occurred in me. This is also the point at which one could define physiological damage as having occurred.
I believe this happened because the person herself was part of a sect and knew the methods. As I investigated and understood each matter one by one, I fell into suspicion due to the large number of people appearing around me. For example, as a test, if I walked while making an unusual smile or laugh, and a man who appeared to be out for a walk passed by doing exactly the same thing, and if similar events occurred repeatedly elsewhere, one begins to feel that the number of mobilised people is quite large. I repeated many other tests as well.
This city appears to have a particularly large number of such people. I infer this from the existence of ethnic organisations. Even 100 to 1,000 people within a radius of four to five kilometres would be sufficiently large. As for the young Australian woman mentioned above, I believe that because there were articles about the word “YouTuber” having a negative reputation, she was simply made an attack target by bots.
Riko Narumi, a former child actress, gravure idol, and model, apparently released a gravure book titled “12 Years Old” around 2010.
The same can be said of a group that Japan’s major newspaper, the Yomiuri Shimbun, described on its front page as a “national idol” group. In reality, no member of the public had ever said that this female group represented a Japanese-style idol group, yet it was marketed in that way.
In Japan, this group was sold under the name AKB48.
The following URL concerns AKB48, a group that used highly suggestive promotional videos. It includes the later state of the person referred to in the URL above.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkHlnWFnA0c&list=RDlkHlnWFnA0c&start_radio=1
They appeared frequently on television, and posters were displayed in convenience stores throughout the country. I felt a strong sense of abnormality about this.
Summary of the Institutional Request
The essence of this proposal is as follows.
A civilian who has accumulated information and analysis over many years, and who has produced legal and strategic proposals in response to problems that governments have failed to resolve, should not be left unsupported or treated as disposable.
A new legal category should be considered: an international private individual think tank operating within a broader system of international civilian defence.
Such a framework should include:
Formal recognition of the individual’s role and contribution.
A system of financial allowance, remuneration, or award.
Assignment of personnel to manage, protect, and support the individual.
A department responsible for private individual think tanks.
International coordination among allied states or organisations such as NATO.
Continued work on anti-sect law and related security frameworks.
Protection against the human-rights problem of extracting information from an individual without providing institutional support.
This is not merely a request for personal benefit. It is a request for the creation of a legal and institutional structure capable of recognising civilians who, through long-term observation, analysis, and proposal-making, contribute to the defence of democratic societies and the exposure of covert hostile structures.
That’s settled.
コメント
コメントを投稿