---

Strategic Suppression of Adrenaline, Social Boundary Manipulation, and Long-Term Institutional Disruption

What I am describing here is, in my view, the strategic suppression and manipulation of adrenaline.

Adrenaline is not only related to fear or aggression. It also appears in reactions toward things perceived as cute, small, attractive, or emotionally engaging. When people see a cute cat, dog, or child, they may feel an impulse to approach, touch, confirm its presence, or physically express affection. There is even a recognised reaction sometimes referred to as “cute aggression,” in which cuteness produces a strange mixture of affection and aggressive impulse.

My concern is that such reactions can be strategically manipulated.

If a person can be repeatedly exposed to women or girls selected according to different visual, emotional, or personality traits, it may be possible to identify what type most strongly affects him. In my own case, whenever a new school term began, the seat next to me was often left empty, and a girl who had supposedly just moved into the area would sit there.

The pattern appeared sequential. Different types were placed nearby: girls with features that could be considered conventionally attractive to males, girls with darker skin, girls who appeared warm and friendly, shorter girls, taller girls, and so on.

Eventually, when I mentioned that one particular girl was cute, a later person appeared who seemed to combine several of the previous visual and emotional traits. She had darker skin, was quiet, restrained, and did not allow conversation to develop naturally. Instead of speaking normally, she would respond only in small, limited sounds such as “hmm” or “ah.” Precisely because the interaction did not progress normally, a strong emotional fixation was produced.

This is the core of the method I am trying to describe: not simple attraction, but the creation of emotional pressure through selective proximity, restraint, ambiguity, and repeated interruption of normal social rhythm.

In a wider political sense, the public advancement of women has often been discussed under the language of feminism. However, it is possible that different strategies are being applied according to country, race, culture, and local gender expectations.

The result may be that ordinary men are increasingly placed in situations where they must behave with extreme restraint, even toward very young females, while hostile or sect-like groups secretly maintain relationships across gender and age boundaries without the same restraint.

This produces a serious institutional imbalance.

One side consists of ordinary men, who must suppress instinct, emotion, speech, and physical response. The other side consists of malicious groups that may secretly permit themselves every kind of relationship and social tactic while publicly exploiting moral restraint.

The largest concern is not merely personal or sexual confusion. The greater concern is that this same imbalance may affect debate, decision-making, government institutions, corporations, finance, and public policy.

A person who has been socially trained to restrain himself may lose in debate against a person trained to speak calmly, without shame, hesitation, or visible nervousness, even when that person is clearly wrong. This may create a situation in which ordinary people and institutions are gradually pushed into disadvantage by highly trained sect-like actors.

In my view, groups still connected to the former socialist sphere may not be seeking ordinary political influence. Their deeper objective may be destruction: not only direct destruction, but also slow, indirect, structural destruction.

This can take many forms.

One example is finance and lending. Near my area, there appeared to be a motorcycle shop dealing with Harley-Davidson motorcycles. From the outside, it looked as if 200 to 300 motorcycles were densely placed there. Many appeared to be new motorcycles worth around 20,000 to 30,000 dollars each.

The shop disappeared within two or three years. That outcome was predictable. Such expensive motorcycles cannot easily be sold in large numbers, especially in an ageing society where the motorcycle market itself is shrinking. Most motorcycle businesses cannot survive by selling motorcycles alone; they usually need repair work, accessories, inspections, used vehicles, or other related services.

If a local bank financed such stock, the unpaid debt could be very large. If 100 motorcycles were valued at 25,000 dollars each, that would already represent 2.5 million dollars in exposure for one shop. If 200 motorcycles were involved, the figure could reach 5 million dollars. If ten similar shops existed, the debt could reach 50 million dollars.

This kind of situation may not attract immediate national attention. It happens locally, quietly, and slowly. Yet if similar lending decisions are repeated, local banks may be weakened one by one. Later, consolidation or absorption can be proposed as if it were a natural solution.

Across the street from that former Harley-Davidson shop is a large home-centre store called Kohnan. Inside the store, announcements have stated that the company achieved 600 stores. Yet the number of customers on the floor did not appear to match the scale of the store space. This raises a similar concern: excessive expansion, excessive physical infrastructure, and eventual vulnerability when financial conditions worsen.

My concern is that hostile long-term groups may be waiting for precisely this kind of structural weakening. They may not need to destroy institutions directly. They only need to encourage overexpansion, excessive lending, poor allocation of capital, and distorted corporate decisions until crisis becomes inevitable.

This way of thinking seems closer to older large-scale strategic offensives associated with figures such as Winston Churchill, Dwight Eisenhower, or George Patton, rather than modern short-term political tactics. It is broad, slow, and offensive in scale.

The subprime loan crisis showed a similar pattern. Internationally, people in ordinary jobs were encouraged to buy houses, vehicles, and luxury items far beyond what their income could reasonably support. In some cases, even workers in supermarkets or similar occupations were encouraged to purchase multiple expensive vehicles. The basic relationship between income and repayment capacity was ignored.

That could only lead to default, delayed recovery, and bad debt.

My interpretation is that such outcomes may occur when ordinary, conventionally educated groups lose debates inside economic and policy institutions. Sect-like actors may possess extremely strong debate skills. Even when they say something clearly wrong, they can make it sound correct. Even lower-level members rarely show visible embarrassment, panic, blushing, or anxiety. They speak calmly, avoid responsibility, and shift the situation until they appear to be in the stronger position.

I have seen this even at the lower level.

Around 2010, I tried to contact an old acquaintance in relation to buying a car. When I asked for another friend’s phone number, this man said that he worked at a used-car shop and suggested meeting.

At the restaurant, he first presented himself in a low-profile, almost harmless way. He placed his smartphone on the table and made himself appear smaller and calmer. Since we were no longer teenagers, I assumed that he had matured.

However, in the 1990s, this same man had played a role in bringing girls into social situations. When I saw that he had a smartphone around 2010, I noticed it slightly, because at that time I personally believed smartphones would not become popular. The atmosphere also gave me the impression that he might still be in contact with people from the past.

The car discussion itself appeared to be only a pretext. After looking through the printed vehicle documents and saying he would search for options, he asked whether I was still in contact with old friends.

Then, suddenly, he said: “And what about Lisa?”

This was the name of a girl from my youth toward whom I had long felt that I might have behaved badly. I did not understand why he had suddenly brought up that name, and I became visibly unsettled.

Until that point, the conversation had repeatedly brought my mind back to the 1990s and to teenage memories. In retrospect, that may have been the setup. The sudden mention of that name was enough to destabilise me.

As soon as I became unsettled, his attitude changed. The low-profile posture disappeared. He suddenly became the same unpleasant and aggressive personality I remembered from the 1990s. He mocked my old motorcycle style as “nostalgic,” implying that it was outdated and old-fashioned.

Then, instead of discussing the 1500cc vehicle I was looking for, he began pushing a small 600cc car, saying it would be extremely easy to drive and asking whether I would buy it.

In other words, the moment the situation reversed, he immediately shifted into a superior position and looked down on me. I did not understand the situation at the time. I simply thought that a rotten personality had not changed, rejected the 600cc idea as absurd, and left quickly.

This was likely only a low-ranking sect-like actor. Yet even at that level, he could move from a harmless low-profile posture to emotional triggering, reversal of dominance, mockery, and pressure with remarkable smoothness.

The same pattern may exist at higher levels in corporations, banks, government agencies, and international policy circles.

After the subprime crisis, around 2013, I developed certain monetary-policy concepts and sent explanations through contact forms to Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party. Later, terms such as Abenomics and Bidenomics became widely used. Today, the market capitalisation of major American companies, especially those listed on Nasdaq, has reached a scale comparable to nation-states.

If another financial crisis occurs, the United States government may face a situation in which the scale of corporate debt, investment exposure, and market collapse becomes impossible to cover. The amount may be so large that the state itself could be placed under extreme pressure.

My concern is that hostile groups may either be waiting for the next financial crisis or preparing to create one.

For that reason, I believe these issues should not be dismissed as personal memories, local business failures, youth behaviour, or ordinary financial mistakes. They may represent connected patterns: emotional destabilisation, social boundary manipulation, institutional debate advantage, distorted lending, corporate overexpansion, and long-term structural sabotage.

I present this not as a confirmed criminal allegation, but as a civilian strategic observation requiring political, institutional, and intelligence-level review.

---

How I Developed the Concept of Monetary Easing

I may write in more detail someday about how I developed my concept of monetary easing.

However, I should make clear that I do not possess any particular talent as an investor. I have never been especially interested in reading market movements based on the statements of political leaders, central bankers, major investors, or other important figures.

My interest has always been different. I was far more concerned with how stability could be created.

The materials I learned from were, in many cases, simply videos.

In the early period of YouTube, I believe the platform contained many people from hedge funds, elite universities, software development, major corporations, and academia. Among them, there was a young Yale University professor who posted explanations of financial structures in a way that was easy to understand.

His own view appeared to be rather critical. However, while watching the situation of young people becoming homeless and economically displaced, I began to think about the possibility of monetary easing from a different angle.

At some point, the idea came to me almost suddenly, and I posted my thoughts.

Around one year later, I began to see the abnormal rise in the market capitalisation of American technology-related stocks, as well as unusual movements in the Nasdaq and the Nikkei average.

Of course, I received no reply, no questions, and no acknowledgement of any kind.

---

I call this Orenomics.(Mynomics)

I am not an investor, nor did I approach monetary policy as a market player.

My concern was social stability, not profit.

From my perspective, I did not merely observe monetary easing from the outside. I developed and submitted the concept from a civilian position before similar policy directions became visible in Japan and the United States.

In plain terms, I would say:

I created the concept of monetary easing as a civilian stabilisation strategy.

It may sound bold, but that is the most accurate way to describe my position.

-日本語原文。

私がここで唱えている物はアドレナリンの戦略的な抑制です。アドレナリンとは猫や犬などのかわいい物を見た場合でも撫でたい、触りたい、頬擦りをしたい。近寄り存在を確かめたい。と言う反応に現れると思いますが、このアドレナリンとは攻撃意識でもある為、 キュートアグレッションと言う反応もあるとされる。これはかわいいと感じる物に対し、アドレナリン、つまり攻撃欲求を感じるわけです。かわいいと感じるように戦略的に誘導するなど、手法は多岐に渡る。1人に対し、あらゆる女、少女を接近させ好みの女、少女のタイプを探る。私のケースでは常に学期が明けると私の隣は空席で、必ず越してきたと言う少女が座った。これは順番にあらゆる古典的に男性が好みそうな単純な体型の特徴を持つ者から、肌が浅黒い、友情深い、背が低い、背が高い、と言った感じで順番に座る。 遂に、ある少女がかわいいと周囲に言うと、それまでの外見的、内面的特徴を合わせた者が攻撃者として現れる。肌が浅黒い、控えめ、または話しを弾ませない。と言う徹底した態度。話しが弾む相手では、恋愛感情は芽生えず、話しをうーん、とか、あー、、と言う小さい声でしか徹底して返さない少女がが座り、その少女に強い恋愛感情や性的欲求が強くなりました。 女性の社会での活躍は、フェミニズムにも置き換えられ、あらゆる国や人種特性に合わせて、戦略が敷かれているだろう。 結局は、女性により、抑制的に振る舞わないといけない時代に順番になっているだろう。 元々、肉体的に支配的であった、優位を男性が、イスラム教にあるように作り出す歴史と、関係は、現代において、幼い少女にすら女性に振る舞わないといけないように、変化が起きた事にすら気づかない速度でゆっくり変貌しているわけです。 一般的な男性は、アドレナリンの抑制、攻撃意欲に関するホルモンがより強く、抑制される傾向に陥り、Sectは裏で男女、年齢を超えたあらゆる関係を保持しています。この場合、懸念されるのは、企業や政府内でのディベートでの不利に追い込まれると言う点が最大の危機です。一方は周囲により抑制し振る舞わないといけない。一般的な男性。一方は、あらゆる関係を密かに許された、悪意ある集団。と言う実態が存在しています。 この場合、依然、旧社会主義圏にいる者が望むのはあらゆる破壊だけである。 単純な破壊から、見えにくい変容型破壊まで多岐に渡る。銀行などでの借り入れ等、多岐 に渡ります。付近に200台〜300台。少なくともそれくらいに見える。屋外からは、新品の2〜3万ドルのバイクが密集しているように見えた。ハーレーダビッドソンを置いた店が現れたが、2〜3年で店舗は潰れた。当然、こう言ったオートバイが簡単に売れるわけもありません。これは社内方針を変容させられた後の銀行の貸し出しだっただろう。 この場合、銀行は貸し出した資金を全く回収できず、地方銀行であれば、相当額の負債を抱える事になるだろう。単純に計算すれば、100台×2.5万ドルの車両価格だった場合、一店舗で、250万ドルの負債であり、200台なら、500万ドルの負債で、10軒。店舗を出していた場合、5000万ドルの負債である。ハーレーダビッドソンだけでなく、オートバイは現在、少子高齢化も進み、全体的に流行は下がっており、1台でも売れたか？不明である。通常は、オートバイを扱うショップはそれだけでは経営が成り立たたない為、多角経営が普通です。 こう言った国家から見えにくい、放置され易い地方銀行など、目立たない場所でジワジワと一個一個、危機に陥らせると、次に統合を持ちかけるだろう。しかし、依然社会主義圏にいる者の目的は、現地で役員をしている者の意思に反し、半世紀後に見たいと考えているだろう、破壊である。一個一個過剰な生産、過剰な出店を引き起こせば、それはいつかは危機になる。と考えているはずである。銀行統合が起きても積極的な投資に陥るでしょう。

そのハーレーのショップの斜め前にあるのは、 コーナンと呼ばれるホームセンターです。ホームストアー。店内のアナウンスでは、600店舗の出店を達成した！と放送されているが、客数がフロアに相当しているか？と言えば全く成り立っていません。これらがいつかは金融危機とあらゆる情勢と後退するのを待っているのが、旧社会主義圏にいるそれらのグループであり、報復心に満ち溢れているようだ。これらは、書いたように、ウインストンチャーチル、アイゼンハワー、パットンのような大規模な攻勢を仕掛ける時代の発想に根付いており、その時代から変わらない主義であるようだ。変わるべきプロセスが無かった為だろう。現在の通常の国家の戦略規模とは一切異なるようである。サブプライムローンでは、国際的に住宅〜 スーパーの店員に2台の5万ドルを超える高級車を購入させるなど、異常な事態に陥っていました。これは当然、回収不可能になる。回収速度が極端に遅い。焦げつきを生み出すわけで、給与と返済額が見合わない と言う単純な基礎も無視され、行使されていた。これはディベートで世界経済会議等で一般的に育ったグループが敗北し、起きた事態と考えられる。Sectのディベート力は非常に強く、明らかに間違っている事を言っていても、相手が正しく聞こえる話術を十分に身につけている。会話中、末端のSectですら、赤らみ、焦り、慌て、こう言った様子は一切見られず、淡々と話し、明らかその人物に責任がある場合でも、どのような責任追求でもあっさり状況を回避し、責任から逃れていく。強者に回ると言う状況を作る事に異常に長けている。これは、後年会った際でも、優位性を必ず作り出す手法を心理学的に学んでいる。また継続性がある。知識や学力が無さそうな者でも、十分な戦略を保持している。 車の購入。中古車に関して他の友人の電話番号を聞こうとすると、自分が中古車屋に勤めているから会おうと言う。私が過去より華奢ではなくなり、ライブイベントなどで、大きい声でMCをした経験などから、大きい声で話し、あまり譲らない姿勢になっていると言う情報を得ています。また、そこで即席で状況を作るだろう。 まず、スマートフォンをファミリーレストランのテーブルに身体を小さく見せ、置く。 2010年ころですから、お互いに少年ではありません。落ち着いた年齢層であるはずである。つまり、私はその対象が相当に落ち着いた。と安心するわけです。 この男は10代。90年代に少女を連れてくる役割であり、私は、2010年頃にスマートフォンをその男が持っている事に関してやや気を留める。当時はスマートフォンは絶対に流行しないと考えていた為、やや気になっただけです。つまり、雰囲気としては、まだ過去、呼んできた少女や女と交流があるように感じた。スマートフォンが電話番号のリストをイメージさせる役割を負った小物で、Mockでさえあるかもしれない。過去の交流と活発なやり取りがあるように感じられた。車の話しは相手には、材料に過ぎず、それらのコピー用紙を一通り見終わる。探しておく。と言う1時間くらいの会話の最後、昔の友人と連絡を取っているか？聞かれた後、『で、リサは？』と、突如、少年時代に悪い事をしてしまったと感じた異性の名前を出し、私はなぜそのような質問をされたか？分からず、慌てが生じます。 それまでに旧友はもう、大人になり落ち着いている。と、感じているが、90年代。10代の頃の話題が、しばしば現れ、その時代に回想が起きている。つまりその異性の名前に繋がる、戦略に過ぎず、私が傷つけた と当時考えていた10年以上前の相手ですが、私が慌てるには十分な素材である。私に慌てが生じると、肩を小さく見せ、ロープファイル。過小評価させる態度から、一変し、私が、90年代のバイクを派手にしないで乗っていた為、『なつかしーー』 ノスタルジックーー、、つまり古臭いー。と、私に慌てが生じ、状況が反転すると即座に90年代と同じような、不快な性格者であり、攻撃者に変わります。そして、探している、1500ccの車ではなく、600ccの小さい車。超楽だ。買わないか？と言う話しに結びつけ始める。つまり、状況が反転した直後、即座に上から見下すように見る者に即座に変わるわけです。90年代に悪意ある性格に即座に変わる。私は、状況が分からず、腐った人間性は変わらない物だ。と、考え、600cc？馬鹿げている。ダサい、と言うような事を告げ、特殊な危険性を感じ、足早に立ち去った。 これは末端の最も低ランクのSectのはずですが、ロープファイル。自己を過小評価させる態度から、優位性への状況反転、悪意ある性格を再度現すまで、完璧に熟せる。と言う事である。 これは大企業などに関わるSectなどでも同じような物にはずだろう。 私はサブプライムローンののちの時代。金融政策を2013年頃考案し、日本の自民党にコンセプトを説明。コンタクトフォームで送り、後、アベノミクス、バイデノミクス等言われる。現在、ナスダック、主にアメリカの企業の時価総額は国家総資産規模の時価総額を保持しており、次に金融危機が起きれば、世界中から集まった投資に対し、アメリカは政府として、そう言った企業の債務を支払いが不可能に陥り、完全に破産する規模の額になっているわけです。彼らは、次の金融危機を待っているか、創作する計画を立てている可能性があるだろう。