法律家になると人権団体などとも関係を持ち始め、その人の個性次第で、活動に慎重にならざる得なくなくなるかもしれませんが。

裁量の義務とは、国家にとって自由判断をして良い。と言う意味である。『あなたは殺人を犯しました。計画的に。それも詐欺犯でした。それは、他者に害のない人に至って、当然世界は、人権は平等に働いていない為、あなただけを優先できません。あなたの人権の降格、または失効を申し付ける。』

と言う当然行われて良い活動の事です。人権が降格した場合、

あらゆる監視や圧力を受け、その国の裁量で、刑期を伸ばすなどが可能になる。

『あなたの民族団体の中のあるグループのみ優先し、我が国の国民が苦悩、苦労、問題を抱える事は、認められません。そのように裁量の義務。我々は大変残念で心苦しいと思っていますが、ですが、人権の不平等が起きないよう、均等を図る為、あなた方の基本的人権を降格、または失効を決定しました。』と言う概念です。国家の不作為にならない為、審理後、その場で無条件で拘束出来る。と言う厳しい考え方です。

その人の行動によって、人権が高くなるかどうかは不明である。その人を見る集団が自然に、本来は決める事である。王、天皇、皇室、政治家などになると、非常にあらゆる優遇がおきますが、つまり大して働かずとも悠長に世界の事を気にせず食事にも医療にも何も困らずその一家に生まれたと言うだけで無条件にフルサポートで生活が出来る。これも人権の平等ではない。

ーーー

Becoming legal policymake,it means becoming a politician. A may involve dealing with human rights organizations, and depending on one's personality, this might necessitate careful consideration of their activities.But,the group have to be strong.

The duty of discretion means that a state has the right to make free judgments. For example, "You committed murder. It was premeditated. Furthermore, It was an insurance fraud scheme aimed at obtaining funds.Considering that there are people in this world who do not harm others, this court has decided that, and because the world and human rights do not operate equally, we cannot prioritize you alone. We hereby order the demotion or repeal of your human rights."

This is an action that is perfectly permissible. And its whats is human right.If human rights are demotion,

Court can say,『you may be subject to all kinds of surveillance and pressure, and the state can extend your sentence at its discretion.』

"We cannot accept that a certain group within your ethnic organization is prioritized, causing suffering, hardship, and problems for the citizens of our country. This is the duty of discretion. We are deeply saddened and regretful, but in order to ensure equality and prevent human rights inequality, we have decided to demotion or repeal your fundamental human rights." This is the concept. This is a strict approach that allows for unconditional detention immediately after the trial, in order to prevent the state from being inactive.

It is unclear whether a person's actions will lead to an increase in their human rights. It is something that the group observing that person should naturally decide. Kings, emperors, members of the imperial family, and politicians receive all sorts of preferential treatment; that is, they can live comfortably without working much, without worrying about the world, without having to worry about food or medical care, and receive full support unconditionally just for being born into that family. This is also not equality of human rights. Young, inexperienced malice yakuza selling methamphetamine are unlikely to approach them.『King,this is metanphtamin,』『Metan,,what?』『It makes feel refreshed for about three days.』

Naturally, there are those like Queen Elizabeth who are proactive in resolving domestic issues, but there are also groups like the Japanese royal family who don't do much.

ーーー

次に民間防衛は、国民による諜報組織です。最も単純な活動なら、例として、私なら付近を撮影し行き来し、誰が不審か？勝手に決めて支部化している、自身の地域の指揮系統と協議しそれらのデバイスをアップル、Googleに務める民間防衛グループとも協議し、ハッキングし調査をしていいか？自主的な対スパイ活動をする事である。これは、最大でNATOの管轄下と言う意味です。

これはじゃあ、1000人。と言う数を最初に決めて、割り当ては出来ません。最小人数から適正を見極め拡大します。最初に人数を決定してしまうと無作為に面接のようになると、適正検査の程度が下がり危険であると考えられる。警察組織の失敗がある為です。また、私は独自に活動しあらゆる情報を得ました。

Next, civil defense is an intelligence organization run by citizens. In its simplest form, for example, I would take film of the surrounding area, move around, and decide who seems suspicious. I would decide on this myself, and there is a branch, consult with my own command structure, and consult with civil defense groups working at Apple and Google to see if it's okay to hack and investigate their devices. It's about conducting independent counter-espionage activities. 

This involves conducting independent counter-espionage activities. This, at its maximum, falls under NATO's jurisdiction.

Also this means government can't simply decide on a number, like 1000 people, and assign them. We start with a minimum number, assess suitability, and then expand. If we decide on the number from the beginning, it becomes like a random interview, which lowers the level of suitability testing and is considered dangerous. This is due to past failures in police organizations. Furthermore, I have conducted my own independent activities and obtained all kinds of information.

Alternatively, in public,facilities, there must be groups willing to risk their lives in the event of an emergency. This would allow them to receive benefits or allowance and have high-value insurance. Specific Citizens could directly monitor and track spies and suspicious organizations in public or such as facilities. Or, depending on the individual, detectives could go to their homes and wait outside to intimidate them, saying, "We know who you are." "We will kill you"

From larger bobies.And with experience.

This is because some people, according to certain standards, are not particularly intimidated by someone who is merely just a spy.As Bad Civilian experience too.As my senior.

If just a spy,won't stand a chance against 20 or 30 football hooligans. That's the gist of it. Even if it causes trouble, it's just civilian activity. In this case NATO has to permit it, at least.

There are not unconditional rules, but rather their own set of rules, and the outlaws who rejoice in the victory of their own region do not want to tolerate mere outlaws.

The police's participation is selected for civil defense purposes, and even if it escalates into an assault, it will not be a typical assault case but rather a monitoring of an illegal group, and measures can be taken to prevent normal reporting or complaints. These measures will only be taken after the person in question is determined to be a member of an illegal organization. This is not vigilante justice, but simply a means of intimidating the other party by asking, "What are you doing in our country, in our territory?" If the other party shows a disregard for society, even if it escalates to vigilante justice, the responsibility will ultimately lie with the person who secretly committed the wrongdoing.So that is fun time.

Having experienced being a gang member, being kidnapped by lower rank yakuza or inexperienced yakuza.Also nearly being killed.

And I was joined attacked around 200 crew,no one arrested.And find it baffling that somengroups don't make such STRONG decisions and take action.I heard those opponent almost killed.Dead.I thinking almost dead.Or mean of dead.

  Perhaps because politicians have focused solely on learning and avoided even minor crimes, they or you may not understand how to maintain a healthy distance with friends, acquaintances with delinquent friend groups to function appropriately within society without being criticized. 

I believe that, surprisingly, nothing happens even when you try various things. I pay close attention to my surroundings, and if it's safe, I don't really obey traffic signals. I certainly wouldn't stop for a pedestrian signal that's only 1 meter wide, whether it's red or rainbow-colored. But there are foolish people out there who would stop for those kinds of signals.

After seeing videos of the Autobahn with no speed limit, I tried renting a foreign car even after turning 40, driving about 5?0km in an hour or it was going to a place 3?0km away, but nothing happened. (The owner of that shop might have done it too)However, I always made sure to be very careful, not reckless, and slowed down even if I wasnt side of stop line.Watch left and right,and watch left and right again,and start it again,quite slowly,,Even in the passing lane, you can't just pass without thinking. If you spot a car attempting to overtake, safely slow down to roughly the same speed by the time you reach that point, and make a careful decision until the very last moment.

However, that speed range is probably used by a surprisingly large number of riders.

I once spoke to a gas station attendant in my neighborhood whose son is a motorcycle police officer, and he said that it feels great to drive at almost top speed down this road late at night.

So I think they are Chinese ancestry

ーー

Did you understand the general mean or contents?

law is working in rough.Rule is tight thing.

ーー

そして、2000年頃。友人のクラブでのDJイベントで何回か横須賀に行ったが、55年体制以外では、小泉首相のみがメディアと適当な距離を図り比較的自由に振る舞う事が出来る有能な首相と感じる人物でしたが、横須賀出身者である。

横須賀に高速道路で到着すると、軍事工廠と言う風景がどーんと広がり、目抜き通りもドブ板通りと言う名称である。

昔は、海兵隊はもっと遥かに荒っぽく、2000年の段階でも憲兵が常時規則正しく歩き、独特の緊張感がある街でそこで育った人は、感受性が異なって当然だろう。

言説でも戦いの原則を理解しており、ほぼ1人で受け身になる事などなくメディアと衆院を掻き回せた。

日本のほとんどは非常に田舎で、こう言った緊張感などない地域ばかりで独特の野心(善良型)など育つはずもない。

状況が悪ければ、自民党とは、・中国に汚染されている。・単に真面目で消極的かつ戦い方を知らず助けた市民との新規に交流を測る方法も知らない。分からない・旧日本軍の反国家主義者が入り込んでいる。このどれかである。

2番目の場合。境界性パーソナリティ障害などであるとスパイでなくても危険である。サイクル型の虐待や良識がある人物に擬態をする。サイクル型擬態とは、行動パターンとしては、親子でありながら、子供を内密にあらゆる手法で追い詰める性格構造であり、育児放棄を計画的に隠蔽する。蜜月期、良好な関係期を暗に作り、子供が安心すると、虐待期に再度入り込むサイコパス。育児放棄の重度の陰湿版であり、症状を見る限り精神異常に十分に見える。社会性に沿った擬態を徹底し、自身は如何に善良なのか？と言う態度にあらゆる人物の前で徹底する。私の母は重度のこの症状であった。2018年に死亡した時、心から安堵した。

これは当人も気づき難い、重い病気であると思われる。処方や精神科への通院は、悪意がそこまで根深いと社会的に想定されていない為、起き難い。または存在しない。恐らく、幼少期 友人、友情を周囲と持つ経験の欠落を持ち、代わりに権威や権力を暗に持つ事が可能な政府等に就職をする傾向もある。とされる。

自民党がどのような危機を私が解消したとしても私と絶対に、距離を置く理由に、サイクル型虐待に似た特性がある時、私は彼らにとって意図的に重度の高い、悪意を持ち意図的かつ暗に虐待を出来る格好の対象である。と言う危険性がある。この場合は最悪で、市民が虐待の対象であり、実に善良であるような態度も示す為、ジキルとハイドのような症状は、普通の人が見て、全く考えられない程度、達観し徹底していると考えられるそうであり、通常はそう言った人物がいると言う想定もほとんど、またはないようである。